Literature DB >> 17195900

Increasing the number of gray shades in medical display systems--how much is enough?

Tom Kimpe1, Tom Tuytschaever.   

Abstract

Medical images produced by x-ray detectors, computed tomography (CT) scanners, and other modalities typically contain between 12-16 bits/pixel, which corresponds to 4,096-65,536 shades of gray. On the other hand, we see that these images are visualized by means of medical displays that have much lower available number of gray shades. For a long time medical LCDs only supported 8 bits or 256 shades of gray per pixel. With the introduction of medical displays optimized for mammography, the available number of gray scales increased to 1,024. Recently, several manufacturers announced new display systems with higher bit depth. Because higher bit depth often directly results in higher display cost, it is a logical question to ask if this is required or even useful at all. This paper will give an answer by investigating several aspects such as limitations of the human visual system, digital imaging and communication in medicine grayscale standard display function calibration, and characteristics of medical LCDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17195900      PMCID: PMC3043920          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-1052-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  Angular dependence of the luminance and contrast in medical monochrome liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Aldo Badano; Michael J Flynn; Sandrine Martin; Jerzy Kanicki
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  High-fidelity electronic display of digital radiographs.

Authors:  M J Flynn; J Kanicki; A Badano; W R Eyler
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Goniometric and conoscopic measurements of angular display contrast for one-, three-, five-, and nine-million-pixel medical liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Aldo Badano; Dipesh H Fifadara
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Effect of viewing angle on luminance and contrast for a five-million-pixel monochrome display and a nine-million-pixel color liquid crystal display.

Authors:  Dipesh H Fifadara; Alice Averbukh; David S Channin; Aldo Badano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Solution for nonuniformities and spatial noise in medical LCD displays by using pixel-based correction.

Authors:  Tom Kimpe; Albert Xthona; Paul Matthijs; Lode De Paepe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technological and psychophysical considerations for digital mammographic displays.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Viewing angle performance of medical liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Steven L Wright
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.

Authors:  Klaus Bacher; Peter Smeets; An De Hauwere; Tony Voet; Philippe Duyck; Koenraad Verstraete; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Analysis of the development of spatial contrast sensitivity in monkey and human infants.

Authors:  J A Movshon; L Kiorpes
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.129

  9 in total
  27 in total

1.  A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 2: the influence of intra-oral image receptor on periodontal measurements.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Hilde Bosmans; Jie Yang; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  8-bit or 11-bit monochrome displays--which image is preferred by the radiologist?

Authors:  Stephan Bender; Kai Lederle; Christel Weiss; Stefan O Schoenberg; Gerald Weisser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Clinical Applications of a CT Window Blending Algorithm: RADIO (Relative Attenuation-Dependent Image Overlay).

Authors:  Jacob C Mandell; Bharti Khurana; Les R Folio; Hyewon Hyun; Stacy E Smith; Ruth M Dunne; Katherine P Andriole
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Evaluation of low-cost telemammography screening configurations: a comparison with film-screen readings in vulnerable areas.

Authors:  Antonio J Salazar; Javier Romero; Oscar Bernal; Angela Moreno; Sofía Velasco; Xavier Díaz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Panlobular Emphysema: Enhancing Visibility with Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Surya P Bhatt
Journal:  Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis       Date:  2016-05-23

6.  Computed tomography window blending in maxillofacial imaging.

Authors:  Nityanand Miskin; M Travis Caton; Jeffrey P Guenette; Jacob C Mandell
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-11-12

7.  Estrogen deficiency increases variability of tissue mineral density of alveolar bone surrounding teeth.

Authors:  Matthew S Ames; Semi Hong; Hye Ri Lee; Henry W Fields; William M Johnston; Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  The usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography gray values for alveolar bone linear measurements.

Authors:  Soumya Padala; Boon Ching Tee; Frank M Beck; Kathy Elias; Do-Gyoon Kim; Zongyang Sun
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Grey value contrast sensitivity of dental practitioners in function of luminance and age.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jacquet; Roberto G Cleymaet; Peter Bottenberg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Hiding beyond plain sight: Textural analysis of positron emission tomography to identify high-risk plaques in carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Manish Motwani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.