Literature DB >> 16442770

Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.

Klaus Bacher1, Peter Smeets, An De Hauwere, Tony Voet, Philippe Duyck, Koenraad Verstraete, Hubert Thierens.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the combined effects of liquid crystal display (LCD) resolution, image magnification and window/level adjustment on the low-contrast performance in soft-copy image interpretation in digital radiography and digital mammography. In addition, the effect of a new LCD noise reduction mechanism on the low-contrast detectability was studied. Digital radiographs and mammograms of two dedicated contrast-detail phantoms (CDRAD 2.0 and CDMAM 3.4) were scored on five LCD devices with varying resolutions (1-3- and 5-megapixel) and one dedicated 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor. Two 5-megapixel LCDs were included. The first one was a standard 5-megapixel LCD and the second had a new (Per Pixel Uniformity) noise reduction mechanism. A multi-variate analysis of variance revealed a significant influence of LCD resolution, image magnification and window/level adjustment on the image quality performance assessed with both the CDRAD 2.0 and the CDMAM 3.4 phantoms. The interactive adjustment of brightness and contrast of digital images did not affect the reading time, whereas magnification to full resolution resulted in a significantly slower soft-copy interpretation. For digital radiography applications, a 3-megapixel LCD is comparable with a 5-megapixel CRT monitor in terms of low-contrast performance as well as in reading time. The use of a 2-megapixel LCD is only warranted when radiographs are analysed in full resolution and when using the interactive window/level adjustment. In digital mammography, a 5-megapixel monitor should be the first choice. In addition, the new PPU noise reduction system in the 5-megapixel LCD devices provides significantly better results for mammography reading as compared to a standard 5-magapixel LCD or CRT. If a 3-megapixel LCD is used in mammography setting, a very time-consuming magnification of the digital mammograms would be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16442770     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  4 in total

1.  Preliminary investigation of the clinical usefulness of super-high-resolution LCDs with 9 and 15 mega-sub-pixels: observation studies with phantoms.

Authors:  Aya Nishimura; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Yuko Mochiya; Ayumi Morishita; Hiroko Kawashima; Tomoyuki Yamamoto; Mikio Hasegawa; Naofumi Kimura; Shigeru Sanada
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2009-12-25

2.  Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?

Authors:  Karin A Herrmann; H M Bonél; A Stäbler; M Voelk; M Strotzer; C J Zech; M F Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Increasing the number of gray shades in medical display systems--how much is enough?

Authors:  Tom Kimpe; Tom Tuytschaever
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Technical and radiological image quality comparison of different liquid crystal displays for radiology.

Authors:  Francina Em Dams; K Y Esther Leung; Pieter Hm van der Valk; Marc Cjm Kock; Jeroen Bosman; Sjoerd P Niehof
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-10-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.