Literature DB >> 15798066

AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technological and psychophysical considerations for digital mammographic displays.

Ehsan Samei1.   

Abstract

Digital mammography is gradually replacing screen-film analog mammography, a transition driven by a desire to improve the efficiency and possibly the quality of the interpretation of mammograms. Digital mammography involves the use of electronic display devices to display the mammograms. Currently, two electronic technologies are used to display digital mammograms: the cathode-ray tube (CRT) and liquid crystal display (LCD). CRT and LCD devices have imaging characteristics markedly different from those of transilluminated film, which has conventionally been used to display analog mammograms. Consequently, the transition to digital mammography necessitates consideration of a number of psychophysical factors pertaining to effective display of mammograms. Some of these factors are related to specific performance characteristics of the display devices, whereas others are related to inherent characteristics of the human visual system. The main psychophysical factors that affect the interpretation of medical images are contrast, resolution, and noise. Optimal display of mammograms is achieved by taking these factors into consideration and by using time-efficient, intuitive, and reader-specific user interfaces. Because display devices are susceptible to variations in hardware and calibration and to degradation over time, acceptance testing and quality control testing are necessary to maintain an adequate level of display quality. (c) RSNA, 2005.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15798066     DOI: 10.1148/rg.252045185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  12 in total

1.  The effects of ambient lighting in chest radiology reading rooms.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pollard; Ehsan Samei; Amarpreet S Chawla; Craig Beam; Laura E Heyneman; Lynne M Hurwitz Koweek; Santiago Martinez-Jimenez; Lacey Washington; Noriyuki Hashimoto; H Page McAdams
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Need for liquid-crystal display monitors having the capability of rendering higher than 8 bits in display-bit depth.

Authors:  Takeshi Hiwasa; Junji Morishita; Shiro Hatanaka; Masafumi Ohki; Fukai Toyofuku; Yoshiharu Higashida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-12-17

3.  Increasing the number of gray shades in medical display systems--how much is enough?

Authors:  Tom Kimpe; Tom Tuytschaever
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Ananth Poolla; Michael J Ulissey; John M Lewin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Soft-copy display and reading: what the radiologist should know in the digital era.

Authors:  Erich Sorantin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-06-12

6.  Characterization of Luminance and Color Properties of 6-MP Wide-Screen Displays.

Authors:  Michael Silosky; Rebecca M Marsh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.

Authors:  D J McIlgorm; J P McNulty
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Comparison of grayscale and color-scale renderings of digital medical images for diagnostic interpretation.

Authors:  Akio Ogura; Aoi Kamakura; Youhei Kaneko; Tomoya Kitaoka; Norio Hayashi; Anna Taniguchi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-03-27

9.  Human contrast-detail performance with declining contrast.

Authors:  Alisa Walz-Flannigan; Ben Babcock; George C Kagadis; Jihong Wang; Steve G Langer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Could standardizing "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitors to the DICOM part 14: GSDF improve the presentation of dental images? A visual grading characteristics analysis.

Authors:  D J McIlgorm; C Lawinski; S Ng; J P McNulty
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.