Literature DB >> 20409538

Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary.

Denis Drieghe1, Alexander Pollatsek, Barbara J Juhasz, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

A boundary change manipulation was implemented within a monomorphemic word (e.g., fountaom as a preview for fountain), where parallel processing should occur given adequate visual acuity, and within an unspaced compound (bathroan as a preview for bathroom), where some serial processing of the constituents is likely. Consistent with that hypothesis, there was no effect of the preview manipulation on fixation time on the 1st constituent of the compound, whereas there was on the corresponding letters of the monomorphemic word. There was also a larger preview disruption on gaze duration on the whole monomorphemic word than on the compound, suggesting more parallel processing within monomorphemic words. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20409538      PMCID: PMC2882501          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  13 in total

1.  The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; J Hyönä; R Bertram
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Parafoveal processing in word recognition.

Authors:  A Kennedy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-05

Review 3.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 4.  Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Raymond Bertram; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

5.  The IOVP effect in mindless reading: experiment and modeling.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Semantic processing of previews within compound words.

Authors:  Sarah J White; Raymond Bertram; Jukka Hyönä
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Letter-by-letter acquired dyslexia is due to the serial encoding of letters.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Rebecca L Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-07

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  An Investigation into the Processing of Lexicalized English Blend Words: Evidence from Lexical Decisions and Eye Movements During Reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Rebecca L Johnson; Jennifer Brewer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-04

2.  On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews?

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Bernhard Angele; Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-03-01

3.  Word recognition during reading: the interaction between lexical repetition and frequency.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

4.  Psycholinguistic norms for a set of 506 French compound words.

Authors:  Patrick Bonin; Betty Laroche; Alain Méot
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-08

5.  Evidence for morphological composition in compound words using MEG.

Authors:  Teon L Brooks; Daniela Cid de Garcia
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.