Literature DB >> 6889677

A CHO-cell strain having hypersensitivity to mutagens, a defect in DNA strand-break repair, and an extraordinary baseline frequency of sister-chromatid exchange.

L H Thompson, K W Brookman, L E Dillehay, A V Carrano, J A Mazrimas, C L Mooney, J L Minkler.   

Abstract

A mutant of CHO cells (strain EM9) previously isolated on the basis of hypersensitivity to killing by ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) is approx. 10-fold more sensitive than the parental line, AA8, to killing by both EMS and MMS. It is also hypersensitive to killing by other alkylating agents (ethyl nitrosourea and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine), X-rays, and ultraviolet radiation. The production and repair of DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) were studied using the technique of alkaline elution of DNA from filters. After exposure to 4 Gy of X-rays at 0 degrees C and subsequent incubation at 25 degrees C, SSB were repaired within 12 min in AA8, but little repair occurred in EM9. Similarly, with doses of EMS or MMS that produced comparable numbers of SSB in AA8 and EM9 at the end of a 10-min exposure, repair of SSB occurred more rapidly in AA8 than in EM9, suggesting that individual SSB are longer lived in EM9. EM9 was found to be hypersensitive also to the induction of mutations and sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE) by EMS; per unit dose the mutant had twice as many mutations to thioguanine resistance, 3 times as many mutations to azaadenine resistance, and a 7-fold enhancement in SCE, compared to AA8. Moreover, the baseline frequency of SCE in the mutant was extraordinarily high, i.e., 8.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 107 +/- 5 SCE/cell for AA8 and EM9, respectively, with 10 microM BrdUrd in the medium. The high SCE frequency in EM9 did not vary significantly with BrdUrd concentration over the range examined from 2.5 to 20 microM, and the percentage of 5-bromouracil substitution in the DNA was the same in EM9 and AA8 under these conditions. These data, however, do not rule out the possibility that the high SCE frequency in EM9 is a consequence of an altered sensitivity to incorporated BrdUrd. Thus, EM9 may carry a pleiotropic mutation affecting some function in DNA replication and/or DNA repair and causing the variety of phenotypic properties described in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6889677     DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(82)90276-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  65 in total

1.  A cell cycle-specific requirement for the XRCC1 BRCT II domain during mammalian DNA strand break repair.

Authors:  R M Taylor; D J Moore; J Whitehouse; P Johnson; K W Caldecott
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Mutation of a BRCT domain selectively disrupts DNA single-strand break repair in noncycling Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  D J Moore; R M Taylor; P Clements; K W Caldecott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mitochondrial DNA ligase III function is independent of Xrcc1.

Authors:  U Lakshmipathy; C Campbell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Construction of human XRCC1 minigenes that fully correct the CHO DNA repair mutant EM9.

Authors:  K W Caldecott; J D Tucker; L H Thompson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-09-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  XRCC1 and base excision repair balance in response to nitric oxide.

Authors:  James T Mutamba; David Svilar; Somsak Prasongtanakij; Xiao-Hong Wang; Ying-Chih Lin; Peter C Dedon; Robert W Sobol; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-10-29

6.  The region of XRCC1 which harbours the three most common nonsynonymous polymorphic variants, is essential for the scaffolding function of XRCC1.

Authors:  Audun Hanssen-Bauer; Karin Solvang-Garten; Karin Margaretha Gilljam; Kathrin Torseth; David M Wilson; Mansour Akbari; Marit Otterlei
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-01-26

Review 7.  Resistance to cytostatic drugs at the cellular level.

Authors:  C P Vendrik; J J Bergers; W H De Jong; P A Steerenberg
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  Methylating agents and DNA repair responses: Methylated bases and sources of strand breaks.

Authors:  Michael D Wyatt; Douglas L Pittman
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  XRCC1 is specifically associated with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and negatively regulates its activity following DNA damage.

Authors:  M Masson; C Niedergang; V Schreiber; S Muller; J Menissier-de Murcia; G de Murcia
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  The influence of repair pathways on the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity induced by the pyridyloxobutylation pathway of tobacco-specific nitrosamines.

Authors:  Li Li; Joana Perdigao; Anthony E Pegg; Yanbin Lao; Stephen S Hecht; Bruce R Lindgren; Joyce T Reardon; Aziz Sancar; Elizabeth V Wattenberg; Lisa A Peterson
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.