Literature DB >> 25155011

DNA glycosylase activity and cell proliferation are key factors in modulating homologous recombination in vivo.

Orsolya Kiraly1, Guanyu Gong1, Megan D Roytman1, Yoshiyuki Yamada2, Leona D Samson1, Bevin P Engelward3.   

Abstract

Cancer susceptibility varies between people, affected by genotoxic exposures, genetic makeup and physiological state. Yet, how these factors interact among each other to define cancer risk is largely unknown. Here, we uncover the interactive effects of genetical, environmental and physiological factors on genome rearrangements driven by homologous recombination (HR). Using FYDR mice to quantify HR-driven rearrangements in pancreas tissue, we show that DNA methylation damage (induced by methylnitrosourea) and cell proliferation (induced by thyroid hormone) each induce HR and together act synergistically to induce HR-driven rearrangements in vivo. These results imply that developmental or regenerative proliferation as well as mitogenic exposures may sensitize tissues to DNA damaging exposures. We exploited mice genetically deficient in alkyl-adenine DNA glycosylase (Aag) to analyse the relative contributions of unrepaired DNA base lesions versus intermediates formed during base excision repair (BER). Remarkably, results show that, in the pancreas, Aag is a major driver of spontaneous HR, indicating that BER intermediates (including abasic sites and single strand breaks) are more recombinogenic than the spontaneous base lesions removed by Aag. Given that mammals have about a dozen DNA glycosylases, these results point to BER as a major source of pressure on the HR pathway in vivo. Taken together, methylation damage, cell proliferation and Aag interact to define the risk of HR-driven sequence rearrangements in vivo. These data identify important sources of sequence changes in a cancer-relevant organ, and advance the effort to identify populations at high-risk for cancer.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25155011      PMCID: PMC4216056          DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgu177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  52 in total

Review 1.  Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer.

Authors:  J H Hoeijmakers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Homologous recombination as a mechanism for genome rearrangements: environmental and genetic effects.

Authors:  A J Bishop; R H Schiestl
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Analysis of genomic rearrangements associated with EGRFvIII expression suggests involvement of Alu repeat elements.

Authors:  L Frederick; G Eley; X Y Wang; C D James
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Contribution of base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, and DNA recombination to alkylation resistance of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  A Memisoglu; L Samson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Break-induced replication repair of damaged forks induces genomic duplications in human cells.

Authors:  Lorenzo Costantino; Sotirios K Sotiriou; Juha K Rantala; Simon Magin; Emil Mladenov; Thomas Helleday; James E Haber; George Iliakis; Olli P Kallioniemi; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The lyase activity of the DNA repair protein beta-polymerase protects from DNA-damage-induced cytotoxicity.

Authors:  R W Sobol; R Prasad; A Evenski; A Baker; X P Yang; J K Horton; S H Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Susceptibility of proliferating cells to benzo[a]pyrene-induced homologous recombination in mice.

Authors:  A J Bishop; B Kosaras; N Carls; R L Sidman; R H Schiestl
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 8.  Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Meena Shrivastav; Leyma P De Haro; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 9.  Replication stress-induced genome instability: the dark side of replication maintenance by homologous recombination.

Authors:  Antony M Carr; Sarah Lambert
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Modulatory effects of neonatal exposure to TCDD, or a mixture of PCBs, p,p'-DDT, and p-p'-DDE, on methylnitrosourea-induced mammary tumor development in the rat.

Authors:  D Desaulniers; K Leingartner; J Russo; G Perkins; B G Chittim; M C Archer; M Wade; J Yang
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  BERing the burden of damage: Pathway crosstalk and posttranslational modification of base excision repair proteins regulate DNA damage management.

Authors:  Kristin L Limpose; Anita H Corbett; Paul W Doetsch
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

2.  Recombinant cells in the lung increase with age via de novo recombination events and clonal expansion.

Authors:  Takafumi Kimoto; Jennifer E Kay; Na Li; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 3.  Contributions of DNA repair and damage response pathways to the non-linear genotoxic responses of alkylating agents.

Authors:  Joanna Klapacz; Lynn H Pottenger; Bevin P Engelward; Christopher D Heinen; George E Johnson; Rebecca A Clewell; Paul L Carmichael; Yeyejide Adeleye; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 4.  Inflammation-induced DNA damage, mutations and cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Kay; Elina Thadhani; Leona Samson; Bevin Engelward
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-25

5.  Excision of mutagenic replication-blocking lesions suppresses cancer but promotes cytotoxicity and lethality in nitrosamine-exposed mice.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kay; Joshua J Corrigan; Amanda L Armijo; Ilana S Nazari; Ishwar N Kohale; Dorothea K Torous; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Robert G Croy; Dushan N Wadduwage; Sebastian E Carrasco; Stephen D Dertinger; Forest M White; John M Essigmann; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Analysis of mutations in tumor and normal adjacent tissue via fluorescence detection.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kay; Sheyla Mirabal; William E Briley; Takafumi Kimoto; Theofilos Poutahidis; Timothy Ragan; Peter T So; Dushan N Wadduwage; Susan E Erdman; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Inflammation-induced cell proliferation potentiates DNA damage-induced mutations in vivo.

Authors:  Orsolya Kiraly; Guanyu Gong; Werner Olipitz; Sureshkumar Muthupalani; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Focus on DNA Glycosylases-A Set of Tightly Regulated Enzymes with a High Potential as Anticancer Drug Targets.

Authors:  Fabienne Hans; Muge Senarisoy; Chandini Bhaskar Naidu; Joanna Timmins
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  ALKBH7 drives a tissue and sex-specific necrotic cell death response following alkylation-induced damage.

Authors:  Jennifer J Jordan; Sophea Chhim; Carrie M Margulies; Mariacarmela Allocca; Roderick T Bronson; Arne Klungland; Leona D Samson; Dragony Fu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.469

10.  Automated fluorescence intensity and gradient analysis enables detection of rare fluorescent mutant cells deep within the tissue of RaDR mice.

Authors:  Dushan N Wadduwage; Jennifer Kay; Vijay Raj Singh; Orsolya Kiraly; Michelle R Sukup-Jackson; Jagath Rajapakse; Bevin P Engelward; Peter T C So
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.