Literature DB >> 17154509

Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.

Niu Huang1, Brian K Shoichet, John J Irwin.   

Abstract

Ligand enrichment among top-ranking hits is a key metric of molecular docking. To avoid bias, decoys should resemble ligands physically, so that enrichment is not simply a separation of gross features, yet be chemically distinct from them, so that they are unlikely to be binders. We have assembled a directory of useful decoys (DUD), with 2950 ligands for 40 different targets. Every ligand has 36 decoy molecules that are physically similar but topologically distinct, leading to a database of 98,266 compounds. For most targets, enrichment was at least half a log better with uncorrected databases such as the MDDR than with DUD, evidence of bias in the former. These calculations also allowed 40x40 cross-docking, where the enrichments of each ligand set could be compared for all 40 targets, enabling a specificity metric for the docking screens. DUD is freely available online as a benchmarking set for docking at http://blaster.docking.org/dud/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17154509      PMCID: PMC3383317          DOI: 10.1021/jm0608356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  78 in total

1.  Comparison of the NCI open database with seven large chemical structural databases.

Authors:  J H Voigt; B Bienfait; S Wang; M C Nicklaus
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  Successful virtual screening for novel inhibitors of human carbonic anhydrase: strategy and experimental confirmation.

Authors:  Sven Grüneberg; Milton T Stubbs; Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Binding site characteristics in structure-based virtual screening: evaluation of current docking tools.

Authors:  Tanja Schulz-Gasch; Martin Stahl
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2003-01-14       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Consideration of molecular weight during compound selection in virtual target-based database screening.

Authors:  Yongping Pan; Niu Huang; Sam Cho; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors.

Authors:  Holger Gohlke; Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking.

Authors:  Binqing Q Wei; Walter A Baase; Larry H Weaver; Brian W Matthews; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Structure-based discovery of a novel, noncovalent inhibitor of AmpC beta-lactamase.

Authors:  Rachel A Powers; Federica Morandi; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Novel 4-anilinoquinazolines with C-7 basic side chains: design and structure activity relationship of a series of potent, orally active, VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Laurent F Hennequin; Elaine S E Stokes; Andrew P Thomas; Craig Johnstone; Patrick A Plé; Donald J Ogilvie; Michael Dukes; Stephen R Wedge; Jane Kendrew; Jon O Curwen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase by utilizing a novel allosteric binding site.

Authors:  Christopher Pargellis; Liang Tong; Laurie Churchill; Pier F Cirillo; Thomas Gilmore; Anne G Graham; Peter M Grob; Eugene R Hickey; Neil Moss; Susan Pav; John Regan
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-04
View more
  370 in total

1.  Utilizing experimental data for reducing ensemble size in flexible-protein docking.

Authors:  Mengang Xu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Improving molecular docking through eHiTS' tunable scoring function.

Authors:  Orr Ravitz; Zsolt Zsoldos; Aniko Simon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Tim Ten Brink; Fredrick Robin Devadoss Victor Paul Raj; Matthias Keil; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A reverse combination of structure-based and ligand-based strategies for virtual screening.

Authors:  Alvaro Cortés-Cabrera; Federico Gago; Antonio Morreale
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of GOLD scoring functions in a standardized test.

Authors:  John W Liebeschuetz; Jason C Cole; Oliver Korb
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Substantial improvements in large-scale redocking and screening using the novel HYDE scoring function.

Authors:  Nadine Schneider; Sally Hindle; Gudrun Lange; Robert Klein; Jürgen Albrecht; Hans Briem; Kristin Beyer; Holger Claußen; Marcus Gastreich; Christian Lemmen; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  FRED and HYBRID docking performance on standardized datasets.

Authors:  Mark McGann
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Biased retrieval of chemical series in receptor-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Jason B Cross; Christine Humblet
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Improving inverse docking target identification with Z-score selection.

Authors:  Stephanie S Kim; Melanie L Aprahamian; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.817

10.  Docking simulations suggest that all-trans retinoic acid could bind to retinoid X receptors.

Authors:  Motonori Tsuji; Koichi Shudo; Hiroyuki Kagechika
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.