Literature DB >> 22076470

Improving molecular docking through eHiTS' tunable scoring function.

Orr Ravitz1, Zsolt Zsoldos, Aniko Simon.   

Abstract

We present three complementary approaches for score-tuning that improve docking performance in pose prediction, virtual screening and binding affinity assessment. The methodology utilizes experimental data to customize the scoring function for the system of interest considering the specific docking scenario. The tuning approach, which has been implemented as an automated utility in eHiTS, is introduced as a solution to one of the conundrums of the molecular docking paradigm, namely, the lack of a universally well performing scoring function. The accuracy of scoring functions has been shown to be generally system-dependent, and particularly lacking for binding energy and bio-activity predictions. In the proposed approach, pose and energy predictions are enhanced by adjusting the relative weights of the eHiTS energy terms to improve score-RMSD or score-affinity correlations. In a virtual screening context ligand-based similarity is used to rescale the docking score such that better enrichment factors are achieved. We discuss the algorithmic details of the methods, and demonstrate the effects of score tuning on a variety of targets, including CDK2, BACE1 and neuraminidase, as well as on the popular benchmarks--the Directory of Useful Decoys and the PDBBind database.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22076470     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9482-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  43 in total

1.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  The Uppsala Electron-Density Server.

Authors:  Gerard J Kleywegt; Mark R Harris; Jin Yu Zou; Thomas C Taylor; Anders Wählby; T Alwyn Jones
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2004-11-26

5.  General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Wijnand T M Mooij; Marcel L Verdonk
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-11-01

6.  Lessons in molecular recognition. 2. Assessing and improving cross-docking accuracy.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Sutherland; Ravi K Nandigam; Jon A Erickson; Michal Vieth
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  LASSO-ligand activity by surface similarity order: a new tool for ligand based virtual screening.

Authors:  Darryl Reid; Bashir S Sadjad; Zsolt Zsoldos; Aniko Simon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection?

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  AIScore chemically diverse empirical scoring function employing quantum chemical binding energies of hydrogen-bonded complexes.

Authors:  Stephan Raub; Andreas Steffen; Andreas Kämper; Christel M Marian
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  10 in total

1.  Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Tim Ten Brink; Fredrick Robin Devadoss Victor Paul Raj; Matthias Keil; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Monte Carlo loop refinement and virtual screening of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor transmembrane domain.

Authors:  M Rejwan Ali; Rauf Latif; Terry F Davies; Mihaly Mezei
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2014-07-11

3.  Identifying a Small Molecule Blocking Antigen Presentation in Autoimmune Thyroiditis.

Authors:  Cheuk Wun Li; Francesca Menconi; Roman Osman; Mihaly Mezei; Eric M Jacobson; Erlinda Concepcion; Chella S David; David B Kastrinsky; Michael Ohlmeyer; Yaron Tomer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Quantifying reproducibility in computational biology: the case of the tuberculosis drugome.

Authors:  Daniel Garijo; Sarah Kinnings; Li Xie; Lei Xie; Yinliang Zhang; Philip E Bourne; Yolanda Gil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Building a virtual ligand screening pipeline using free software: a survey.

Authors:  Enrico Glaab
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 6.  Computer Aided Drug Design and its Application to the Development of Potential Drugs for Neurodegenerative Disorders.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan Baig; Khurshid Ahmad; Gulam Rabbani; Mohd Danishuddin; Inho Choi
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 7.363

7.  Mitoketoscins: Novel mitochondrial inhibitors for targeting ketone metabolism in cancer stem cells (CSCs).

Authors:  Bela Ozsvari; Federica Sotgia; Katie Simmons; Rachel Trowbridge; Richard Foster; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-24

8.  Multipose binding in molecular docking.

Authors:  Kalina Atkovska; Sergey A Samsonov; Maciej Paszkowski-Rogacz; M Teresa Pisabarro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Selective small molecule compounds increase BMP-2 responsiveness by inhibiting Smurf1-mediated Smad1/5 degradation.

Authors:  Yu Cao; Cheng Wang; Xueli Zhang; Guichun Xing; Kefeng Lu; Yongqing Gu; Fuchu He; Lingqiang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Mitoriboscins: Mitochondrial-based therapeutics targeting cancer stem cells (CSCs), bacteria and pathogenic yeast.

Authors:  Bela Ozsvari; Marco Fiorillo; Gloria Bonuccelli; Anna Rita Cappello; Luca Frattaruolo; Federica Sotgia; Rachel Trowbridge; Richard Foster; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.