Literature DB >> 22371207

Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of GOLD scoring functions in a standardized test.

John W Liebeschuetz1, Jason C Cole, Oliver Korb.   

Abstract

The performance of all four GOLD scoring functions has been evaluated for pose prediction and virtual screening under the standardized conditions of the comparative docking and scoring experiment reported in this Edition. Excellent pose prediction and good virtual screening performance was demonstrated using unmodified protein models and default parameter settings. The best performing scoring function for both pose prediction and virtual screening was demonstrated to be the recently introduced scoring function ChemPLP. We conclude that existing docking programs already perform close to optimally in the cognate pose prediction experiments currently carried out and that more stringent pose prediction tests should be used in the future. These should employ cross-docking sets. Evaluation of virtual screening performance remains problematic and much remains to be done to improve the usefulness of publically available active and decoy sets for virtual screening. Finally we suggest that, for certain target/scoring function combinations, good enrichment may sometimes be a consequence of 2D property recognition rather than a modelling of the correct 3D interactions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22371207     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-012-9551-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  19 in total

1.  A discussion of measures of enrichment in virtual screening: comparing the information content of descriptors with increasing levels of sophistication.

Authors:  Andreas Bender; Robert C Glen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Wijnand T M Mooij; Marcel L Verdonk
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-11-01

Review 3.  Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Sérgio Filipe Sousa; Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes; Maria João Ramos
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-10-01

4.  Lessons in molecular recognition. 2. Assessing and improving cross-docking accuracy.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Sutherland; Ravi K Nandigam; Jon A Erickson; Michal Vieth
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection?

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Empirical scoring functions for advanced protein-ligand docking with PLANTS.

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Thomas Stützle; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Docking performance of fragments and druglike compounds.

Authors:  Marcel L Verdonk; Ilenia Giangreco; Richard J Hall; Oliver Korb; Paul N Mortenson; Christopher W Murray
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen; A R Leach; R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-01-06       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  45 in total

1.  Novel hydrazine derivatives as selective DPP-IV inhibitors: findings from virtual screening and validation through molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Omprakash Tanwar; Girdhar Singh Deora; Lalima Tanwar; Gautam Kumar; Sridhara Janardhan; Mumtaz Alam; Mymoona Akhter
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Comparative modeling and virtual screening for the identification of novel inhibitors for myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase.

Authors:  Syed Sikander Azam; Sara Sarfaraz; Asma Abro
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Biased Docking for Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Arcon; Adrián G Turjanski; Marcelo A Martí; Stefano Forli
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Force Field Optimization Guided by Small Molecule Crystal Lattice Data Enables Consistent Sub-Angstrom Protein-Ligand Docking.

Authors:  Hahnbeom Park; Guangfeng Zhou; Minkyung Baek; David Baker; Frank DiMaio
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  A consistent description of HYdrogen bond and DEhydration energies in protein-ligand complexes: methods behind the HYDE scoring function.

Authors:  Nadine Schneider; Gudrun Lange; Sally Hindle; Robert Klein; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Structural analysis of a plant fatty acid amide hydrolase provides insights into the evolutionary diversity of bioactive acylethanolamides.

Authors:  Mina Aziz; Xiaoqiang Wang; Ashutosh Tripathi; Vytas A Bankaitis; Kent D Chapman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  An integrated approach to knowledge-driven structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Angela M Henzler; Sascha Urbaczek; Matthias Hilbig; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Functional diversification of the chemical landscapes of yeast Sec14-like phosphatidylinositol transfer protein lipid-binding cavities.

Authors:  Ashutosh Tripathi; Elliott Martinez; Ahmad J Obaidullah; Marta G Lete; Max Lönnfors; Danish Khan; Krishnakant G Soni; Carl J Mousley; Glen E Kellogg; Vytas A Bankaitis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Discovery of non-peptidic small molecule inhibitors of cyclophilin D as neuroprotective agents in Aβ-induced mitochondrial dysfunction.

Authors:  Insun Park; Ashwini M Londhe; Ji Woong Lim; Beoung-Geon Park; Seo Yun Jung; Jae Yeol Lee; Sang Min Lim; Kyoung Tai No; Jiyoun Lee; Ae Nim Pae
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Development of purely structure-based pharmacophores for the topoisomerase I-DNA-ligand binding pocket.

Authors:  Malgorzata N Drwal; Keli Agama; Yves Pommier; Renate Griffith
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.