Literature DB >> 22146074

Utilizing experimental data for reducing ensemble size in flexible-protein docking.

Mengang Xu1, Markus A Lill.   

Abstract

Efficient and sufficient incorporation of protein flexibility into docking is still a challenging task. Docking to an ensemble of protein structures has proven its utility for docking, but using a large ensemble of structures can reduce the efficiency of docking and can increase the number of false positives in virtual screening. In this paper, we describe the application of our new methodology, Limoc, to generate an ensemble of holo-like protein structures in combination with the relaxed complex scheme (RCS), to virtual screening. We describe different schemes to reduce the ensemble of protein structures to increase efficiency and enrichment quality. Utilizing experimental knowledge about actives for a target protein allows the reduction of ensemble members to a minimum of three protein structures, increasing enrichment quality and efficiency simultaneously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22146074      PMCID: PMC3337782          DOI: 10.1021/ci200428t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  27 in total

Review 1.  Exploring expression data: identification and analysis of coexpressed genes.

Authors:  L J Heyer; S Kruglyak; S Yooseph
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme.

Authors:  Jung-Hsin Lin; Alexander L Perryman; Julie R Schames; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Protein flexibility and drug design: how to hit a moving target.

Authors:  Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery.

Authors:  Simon J Teague
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 6.  Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications.

Authors:  Chandrika B-Rao; Jyothi Subramanian; Somesh D Sharma
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures.

Authors:  Xavier Barril; S David Morley
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 8.  Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function.

Authors:  Ivet Bahar; Timothy R Lezon; Lee-Wei Yang; Eran Eyal
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.981

9.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Three-dimensional structure of influenza A N9 neuraminidase and its complex with the inhibitor 2-deoxy 2,3-dehydro-N-acetyl neuraminic acid.

Authors:  P Bossart-Whitaker; M Carson; Y S Babu; C D Smith; W G Laver; G M Air
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Induced fit docking, and the use of QM/MM methods in docking.

Authors:  Mengang Xu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Technol       Date:  2013-09

2.  A cross docking pipeline for improving pose prediction and virtual screening performance.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Efficient flexible backbone protein-protein docking for challenging targets.

Authors:  Nicholas A Marze; Shourya S Roy Burman; William Sheffler; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Efficiency of Stratification for Ensemble Docking Using Reduced Ensembles.

Authors:  Bing Xie; John D Clark; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening with Ensemble Docking and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Joel Ricci-Lopez; Sergio A Aguila; Michael K Gilson; Carlos A Brizuela
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Enhancing Virtual Screening Performance of Protein Kinases with Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Tavina L Offutt; Robert V Swift; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Highly predictive ligand-based pharmacophore and homology models of ABHD6.

Authors:  Anna L Bowman; Alexandros Makriyannis
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 2.817

8.  Enrichment of chemical libraries docked to protein conformational ensembles and application to aldehyde dehydrogenase 2.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Cameron D Buchman; Liwei Li; Thomas D Hurley; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 9.  Rational prediction with molecular dynamics for hit identification.

Authors:  Sara E Nichols; Robert V Swift; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles.

Authors:  Robert V Swift; Siti A Jusoh; Tavina L Offutt; Eric S Li; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.