Literature DB >> 12217695

A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking.

Binqing Q Wei1, Walter A Baase, Larry H Weaver, Brian W Matthews, Brian K Shoichet.   

Abstract

Prediction of interaction energies between ligands and their receptors remains a major challenge for structure-based inhibitor discovery. Much effort has been devoted to developing scoring schemes that can successfully rank the affinities of a diverse set of possible ligands to a binding site for which the structure is known. To test these scoring functions, well-characterized experimental systems can be very useful. Here, mutation-created binding sites in T4 lysozyme were used to investigate how the quality of atomic charges and solvation energies affects molecular docking. Atomic charges and solvation energies were calculated for 172,118 molecules in the Available Chemicals Directory using a semi-empirical quantum mechanical approach by the program AMSOL. The database was first screened against the apolar cavity site created by the mutation Leu99Ala (L99A). Compared to the electronegativity-based charges that are widely used, the new charges and desolvation energies improved ranking of known apolar ligands, and better distinguished them from more polar isosteres that are not observed to bind. To investigate whether the new charges had predictive value, the non-polar residue Met102, which forms part of the binding site, was changed to the polar residue glutamine. The structure of the resulting Leu99Ala and Met102Gln double mutant of T4 lysozyme (L99A/M102Q) was determined and the docking calculation was repeated for the new site. Seven representative polar molecules that preferentially docked to the polar versus the apolar binding site were tested experimentally. All seven bind to the polar cavity (L99A/M102Q) but do not detectably bind to the apolar cavity (L99A). Five ligand-bound structures of L99A/M102Q were determined by X-ray crystallography. Docking predictions corresponded to the crystallographic results to within 0.4A RMSD. Improved treatment of partial atomic charges and desolvation energies in database docking appears feasible and leads to better distinction of true ligands. Simple model binding sites, such as L99A and its more polar variants, may find broad use in the development and testing of docking algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12217695     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00777-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  90 in total

1.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ferrari; Binqing Q Wei; Luca Costantino; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Scoring and lessons learned with the CSAR benchmark using an improved iterative knowledge-based scoring function.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Here be dragons: docking and screening in an uncharted region of chemical space.

Authors:  Ruth Brenk; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2005-09-16

6.  Decoys for docking.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Ruth Brenk; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Absolute Binding Free Energies between T4 Lysozyme and 141 Small Molecules: Calculations Based on Multiple Rigid Receptor Configurations.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Trung Hai Nguyen; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance.

Authors:  William J Allen; Trent E Balius; Sudipto Mukherjee; Scott R Brozell; Demetri T Moustakas; P Therese Lang; David A Case; Irwin D Kuntz; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 9.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.