Literature DB >> 22203423

Substantial improvements in large-scale redocking and screening using the novel HYDE scoring function.

Nadine Schneider1, Sally Hindle, Gudrun Lange, Robert Klein, Jürgen Albrecht, Hans Briem, Kristin Beyer, Holger Claußen, Marcus Gastreich, Christian Lemmen, Matthias Rarey.   

Abstract

The HYDE scoring function consistently describes hydrogen bonding, the hydrophobic effect and desolvation. It relies on HYdration and DEsolvation terms which are calibrated using octanol/water partition coefficients of small molecules. We do not use affinity data for calibration, therefore HYDE is generally applicable to all protein targets. HYDE reflects the Gibbs free energy of binding while only considering the essential interactions of protein-ligand complexes. The greatest benefit of HYDE is that it yields a very intuitive atom-based score, which can be mapped onto the ligand and protein atoms. This allows the direct visualization of the score and consequently facilitates analysis of protein-ligand complexes during the lead optimization process. In this study, we validated our new scoring function by applying it in large-scale docking experiments. We could successfully predict the correct binding mode in 93% of complexes in redocking calculations on the Astex diverse set, while our performance in virtual screening experiments using the DUD dataset showed significant enrichment values with a mean AUC of 0.77 across all protein targets with little or no structural defects. As part of these studies, we also carried out a very detailed analysis of the data that revealed interesting pitfalls, which we highlight here and which should be addressed in future benchmark datasets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22203423     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9531-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  38 in total

1.  Partitioning the loss in vancomycin binding affinity for D-Ala-D-Lac into lost H-bond and repulsive lone pair contributions.

Authors:  Casey C McComas; Brendan M Crowley; Dale L Boger
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  NAOMI: on the almost trivial task of reading molecules from different file formats.

Authors:  Sascha Urbaczek; Adrian Kolodzik; J Robert Fischer; Tobias Lippert; Stefan Heuser; Inken Groth; Tanja Schulz-Gasch; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  PMF scoring revisited.

Authors:  Ingo Muegge
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.

Authors:  David A Pearlman; B Govinda Rao; Paul Charifson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-05-15

6.  Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection?

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins.

Authors:  I K McDonald; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitors as a treatment for cancer. Part 2: identification and optimisation of substituted 2,4-bis anilino pyrimidines.

Authors:  Gloria A Breault; Rebecca P A Ellston; Stephen Green; S Russell James; Philip J Jewsbury; Catherine J Midgley; Richard A Pauptit; Claire A Minshull; Julie A Tucker; J Elizabeth Pease
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 10.  Structure, physiological role, and specific inhibitors of human thymidine kinase 2 (TK2): present and future.

Authors:  María-Jesús Pérez-Pérez; Eva-María Priego; Ana-Isabel Hernández; Olga Familiar; María-José Camarasa; Ana Negri; Federico Gago; Jan Balzarini
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 12.944

View more
  31 in total

1.  Ultrafast protein structure-based virtual screening with Panther.

Authors:  Sanna P Niinivehmas; Kari Salokas; Sakari Lätti; Hannu Raunio; Olli T Pentikäinen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  A consistent description of HYdrogen bond and DEhydration energies in protein-ligand complexes: methods behind the HYDE scoring function.

Authors:  Nadine Schneider; Gudrun Lange; Sally Hindle; Robert Klein; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  An integrated approach to knowledge-driven structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Angela M Henzler; Sascha Urbaczek; Matthias Hilbig; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  In vivo anti-malarial activity of the hydroalcoholic extract of rhizomes of Kniphofia foliosa and its constituents.

Authors:  Yonatan Alebachew; Daniel Bisrat; Solomon Tadesse; Kaleab Asres
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Molecular Identification of d-Ribulokinase in Budding Yeast and Mammals.

Authors:  Charandeep Singh; Enrico Glaab; Carole L Linster
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  New small-molecule inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase inhibit Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Qiong Zhang; Thao Nguyen; Megan McMichael; Sadanandan E Velu; Jing Zou; Xuedong Zhou; Hui Wu
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 5.283

7.  QSAR modeling and in silico design of small-molecule inhibitors targeting the interaction between E3 ligase VHL and HIF-1α.

Authors:  Jing Pan; Yanmin Zhang; Ting Ran; Anyang Xu; Xin Qiao; Lingfeng Yin; Weineng Zhou; Lu Zhu; Junnan Zhao; Tao Lu; Yadong Chen; Yulei Jiang
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 2.943

8.  Exploring the effectiveness of novel benzimidazoles as CB2 ligands: synthesis, biological evaluation, molecular docking studies and ADMET prediction.

Authors:  Michele Tonelli; Elena Cichero; Alì Mokhtar Mahmoud; Alessandro Rabbito; Bruno Tasso; Paola Fossa; Alessia Ligresti
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.597

9.  Discovery of Potent Inhibitors of Streptococcus mutans Biofilm with Antivirulence Activity.

Authors:  Bhavitavya Nijampatnam; Parmanand Ahirwar; Piyasuda Pukkanasut; Holly Womack; Luke Casals; Hua Zhang; Xia Cai; Suzanne M Michalek; Hui Wu; Sadanandan E Velu
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Insight into the complete substrate-binding pocket of ThiT by chemical and genetic mutations.

Authors:  L J Y M Swier; L Monjas; F Reeßing; R C Oudshoorn; T Primke; M M Bakker; E van Olst; T Ritschel; I Faustino; S J Marrink; A K H Hirsch; D J Slotboom
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.