Literature DB >> 17148241

Deleterious genomic mutation rate for viability in Drosophila melanogaster using concomitant sibling controls.

Yi Gong1, R C Woodruff, J N Thompson.   

Abstract

New deleterious mutations may reduce health and fitness and are involved in the evolution and maintenance of numerous biological processes. Hence, it is important to estimate the deleterious genomic mutation rate (U) in representative higher organisms. However, these estimated rates vary widely, mainly because of inadequate experimental controls. Here we describe an experimental design (the Binscy assay) with concomitant sibling controls and estimate U for viability in Drosophila melanogaster to be 0.31. This estimate, like most published studies, focuses on viability mutations and the overall deleterious genomic mutation rate would therefore be higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17148241      PMCID: PMC1626383          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  19 in total

1.  Response to Kondrashov.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Experimental tests of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination.

Authors:  William R Rice
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Rapid mutational declines of viability in Drosophila.

Authors:  J D Fry
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  The mutational rate of Drosophila viability decline: tinkering with old data.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY.

Authors:  T MUKAI
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mutation accumulation and the effect of copia insertions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  David Houle; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Helen Borthwick; Carolina Bartolomé; Patricia Pignatelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Properties of spontaneous mutations affecting quantitative traits.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; C López-Fanjul; A Caballero
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Mukai; S I Chigusa; L E Mettler; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Chemical mutagenesis testing in Drosophila: I. Comparison of positive and negative control data for sex-linked recessive lethal mutations and reciprocal translocations in three laboratories.

Authors:  R C Woodruff; J M Mason; R Valencia; S Zimmering
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1984
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sexual selection and its effect on the fixation of an asexual clone.

Authors:  Marcel Salathé
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Rapid increase in viability due to new beneficial mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Priti Azad; Mingchai Zhang; R C Woodruff
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  An extreme test of mutational meltdown shows mutational firm up instead.

Authors:  R C Woodruff
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Increase in viability due to the accumulation of X chromosome mutations in Drosophila melanogaster males.

Authors:  Ronny C Woodruff; Michael A Balinski
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Experimental mutation-accumulation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster reveals stronger selection on males than females.

Authors:  Martin A Mallet; Jessica M Bouchard; Christopher M Kimber; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 7.  Old Trade, New Tricks: Insights into the Spontaneous Mutation Process from the Partnering of Classical Mutation Accumulation Experiments with High-Throughput Genomic Approaches.

Authors:  Vaishali Katju; Ulfar Bergthorsson
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Sexual selection and the evolution of obligatory sex.

Authors:  Lilach Hadany; Tuvik Beker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Spontaneous mutation accumulation in multiple strains of the green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Andrew D Morgan; Rob W Ness; Peter D Keightley; Nick Colegrave
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.