Literature DB >> 17148282

Sexual selection and its effect on the fixation of an asexual clone.

Marcel Salathé1.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is a powerful and ubiquitous force in sexual populations. It has recently been argued that sexual selection can eliminate the twofold cost of sex even with low genomic mutation rates. By means of differential male mating success, deleterious mutations in males become more deleterious than in females, and it has been shown that sexual selection can drastically reduce the mutational load in a sexual population, with or without any form of epistasis. However, any mechanism that claims to maintain sexual reproduction must be able to prevent the fixation of an asexual mutant clone with a twofold fitness advantage. Here, I show that despite very strong sexual selection, the fixation of an asexual mutant cannot be prevented under reasonable genomic mutation rates. Sexual selection can have a strong effect on the average mutational load in a sexual population, but as it cannot prevent the fixation of an asexual mutant, it is unlikely to play a key role on the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148282      PMCID: PMC1833981          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  10 in total

1.  Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  S Siller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; Michael D Jennions; Josephine Morley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Deleterious genomic mutation rate for viability in Drosophila melanogaster using concomitant sibling controls.

Authors:  Yi Gong; R C Woodruff; J N Thompson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox.

Authors:  Joseph L Tomkins; Jacek Radwan; Janne S Kotiaho; Tom Tregenza
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Mutation accumulation in space and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  Marcel Salathé; Rahel Salathé; Paul Schmid-Hempel; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  R S Howard; C M Lively
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Authors:  M A Mallet; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The evolution of obligate sex: the roles of sexual selection and recombination.

Authors:  Maya Kleiman; Lilach Hadany
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.