Literature DB >> 23543206

An extreme test of mutational meltdown shows mutational firm up instead.

R C Woodruff1.   

Abstract

Traditionally, the accumulation of new deleterious mutations in populations or species in low numbers is expected to lead to a reduction in fitness and mutational meltdown, but in this study the opposite was observed. Beginning with a highly inbred populations of Drosophila melanogaster, new mutations that accumulated in experiments of two females and two males or of one female and one male each generation for 52 generations did not cause a decline in progeny numbers over time. Only two lines went extinct among 52 tested lines. In three of four experiments there was a significant increase in progeny numbers over time (mutational firm up), which had to be due to new beneficial, compensatory, overdominant, or back mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23543206     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-013-9716-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  24 in total

1.  Rapid fitness recovery in mutationally degraded lines of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Deleterious genomic mutation rate for viability in Drosophila melanogaster using concomitant sibling controls.

Authors:  Yi Gong; R C Woodruff; J N Thompson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  The fitness effect of mutations across environments: a survey in light of fitness landscape models.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Mutational meltdown in laboratory yeast populations.

Authors:  C Zeyl; M Mizesko; J A de Visser
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Compensatory mutations are repeatable and clustered within proteins.

Authors:  Brad H Davis; Art F Y Poon; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  MUTATION AND EXTINCTION: THE ROLE OF VARIABLE MUTATIONAL EFFECTS, SYNERGISTIC EPISTASIS, BENEFICIAL MUTATIONS, AND DEGREE OF OUTCROSSING.

Authors:  Stewart T Schultz; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Compensating for our load of mutations: freezing the meltdown of small populations.

Authors:  A Poon; S P Otto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster to increased NaCl concentration due to dominant beneficial mutations.

Authors:  Mingcai Zhang; Priti Azad; R C Woodruff
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Estimates of the rate and distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  C Zeyl; J A DeVisser
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  PERSPECTIVE: SPONTANEOUS DELETERIOUS MUTATION.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Jeff Blanchard; David Houle; Travis Kibota; Stewart Schultz; Larissa Vassilieva; John Willis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  2 in total

1.  Increase in viability due to the accumulation of X chromosome mutations in Drosophila melanogaster males.

Authors:  Ronny C Woodruff; Michael A Balinski
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Two sides of the same coin: A population genetics perspective on lethal mutagenesis and mutational meltdown.

Authors:  Sebastian Matuszewski; Louise Ormond; Claudia Bank; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Virus Evol       Date:  2017-03-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.