Literature DB >> 17143634

Do MRI findings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure.

Christoph Quack1, Peter Schenk, Thomas Laeubli, Susanne Spillmann, Juerg Hodler, Beat A Michel, Andreas Klipstein.   

Abstract

To find out whether segmental magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings such as intervertebral disc degeneration (DD) and facet joint osteoarthritis (FJO) are associated with motion deficiencies as seen in common mobility tests and observed range of motion (ROM). A total of 112 female subjects, nurses and office workers, with and without low back pain, were examined by clinical experts, and lumbar mobility was measured including modified Schober, fingertip-to-floor distance (FTFD) and ZEBRIS motion analysis. An MRI of the lumbar spine was made. Mobility findings were correlated with segmental morphologic changes as seen on MRI at the levels of L1-2 through L5-S1. Only a few statistically significant correlations between MRI findings and the results of the mobility tests could be found. Lateral bending was weakly and negatively correlated to DD and FJO but only on the level of L5-S1. The FTFD showed a weak positive correlation to endplate changes on the level of L4-5. When ROM is observed by clinical experts, there are several significant relationships between MRI findings and the observed motion. There is a highly significant segmental correlation between DD and disc form alteration as seen on MRI on the level of single motion segments. Pain history and current pain level did not moderate any association between MRI and mobility. There is no clear relationship between the structural changes represented by MRI and the measured mobility tests used in this study. Our findings suggest that close observation of spinal motion may provide at least equal information about the influence of spinal structures on motion than the commonly used measured mobility tests do.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17143634      PMCID: PMC2200719          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0264-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  46 in total

1.  Measurement of spinal mobility: a comparison of three methods.

Authors:  P M Reynolds
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1975-08

2.  Reliability and validity of four instruments for measuring lumbar spine and pelvic positions.

Authors:  R G Burdett; K E Brown; M P Fall
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1986-05

3.  Measurement of trunk flexibility in normal subjects: reproducibility of three clinical methods.

Authors:  J L Merritt; T J McLean; R P Erickson; K P Offord
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Normal range of spinal mobility. An objective clinical study.

Authors:  J M Moll; V Wright
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spinal range of motion.

Authors:  G K Fitzgerald; K J Wynveen; W Rheault; B Rothschild
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1983-11

6.  Reliability of measuring trunk motions in centimeters.

Authors:  M Frost; S Stuckey; L A Smalley; G Dorman
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1982-10

7.  Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Correlations of spinal mobility with degree of chronic low back pain after correction for age and anthropometric factors.

Authors:  G Mellin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography.

Authors:  M J Pearcy; S B Tibrewal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Spinal flexibility and individual factors that influence it.

Authors:  M C Batti'e; S J Bigos; A Sheehy; M D Wortley
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1987-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Symptomatology of recurrent low back pain in nursing and administrative professions.

Authors:  Peter Schenk; Thomas Läubli; Juerg Hodler; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Tue Secher Jensen; Jaro Karppinen; Joan S Sorensen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Reliability of three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry measurements of lumbar flexion and extension.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Vanitha Arumugam; Joshua I Vincent; Kimberly L Payne; Aubrey K So
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Ultrasound-guided epidural block in axial spondyloarthritis patients with limited spine mobility: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A M Elsaman; A Hamed; A R Radwan
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2021-01-01

6.  Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain.

Authors:  Tim Mitchell; Peter B O'Sullivan; Angus F Burnett; Leon Straker; Anne Smith
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Can ultrasound be an assessment tool for sagittal spine mobility and chest expansion in patients with ankylosing spondylitis?

Authors:  Ozan Volkan Yurdakul; Aylin Rezvani
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.