Literature DB >> 17611784

Symptomatology of recurrent low back pain in nursing and administrative professions.

Peter Schenk1, Thomas Läubli, Juerg Hodler, Andreas Klipstein.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore if (a) recurrent low back pain (LBP) has different symptomatologies in cases from occupations with predominantly sitting postures compared to cases from occupations involving dynamic postures and frequent lifting and (b) if in the two occupational groups, different factors were associated with the presence of recurrent LBP. Hundred and eleven female subjects aged between 45 and 62 years with a long-standing occupation either in administrative or nursing professions, with and without recurrent LBP were examined. An extensive evaluation of six areas of interest (pain and disability, clinical examination, functional tests, MR examination, physical and psychosocial workplace factors) was performed. The variables from the six areas of interest were analyzed for their potential to discriminate between the four groups of subjects (administrative worker and nurses with and without recurrent LBP) by canonical discriminant analysis. As expected, the self-evaluation of physical and psychosocial workplace factors showed significant differences between the two occupational groups, which holds true for cases as well as for controls (P < 0.01). The functional tests revealed a tendency for rather good capacity in nurses with LBP and a decreased capacity in administrative personnel with LBP (P = 0.049). Neither self completed pain and disability questionnaires nor clinical examination or MR imaging revealed any significant difference between LBP cases from sedentary and non-sedentary occupations. When comparing LBP cases and controls within the two occupational groups, the functional tests revealed significant differences (P = 0.0001) yet only in administrative personnel. The clinical examination on the other hand only discriminated between LBP cases and controls in the nurses group (P < 0.0001). Neither MRI imaging nor self reported physical and psychosocial workplace factors discriminated between LBP cases and controls from both occupational groups. Although we used a battery of tests that have broad application in clinical and epidemiological studies of LBP, a clear difference in the pattern of symptoms between LBP cases from nursing and hospital administration personnel could not be ascertained. We conclude that there is no evidence for different mechanisms leading to non-specific, recurrent LBP in the two occupations, and thus no generalizable recommendations for the prevention and therapy of non-specific LBP in the two professions can be given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17611784      PMCID: PMC2223334          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0346-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  44 in total

1.  Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; P M Bongers; H C de Vet; M Douwes; B W Koes; M C Miedema; G A Ariëns; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders.

Authors:  A Burdorf; G Sorock
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 3.  Low back pain.

Authors:  Maurits van Tulder; Bart Koes; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.098

4.  Chronic pain in Holocaust survivors.

Authors:  A Yaari; E Eisenberg; R Adler; J Birkhan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Do MRI findings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure.

Authors:  Christoph Quack; Peter Schenk; Thomas Laeubli; Susanne Spillmann; Juerg Hodler; Beat A Michel; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  J Hildebrandt; M Pfingsten; P Saur; J Jansen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  D Weishaupt; M Zanetti; J Hodler; N Boos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Back pain--individual and genetic factors.

Authors:  Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.368

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Stochastic resonance whole-body vibration, musculoskeletal symptoms, and body balance: a worksite training study.

Authors:  Achim Elfering; Sibille Arnold; Volker Schade; Christian Burger; Lorenz Radlinger
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2013-08-02

Review 3.  Exposure to psychosocial risk factors in the context of work: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cláudia Fernandes; Anabela Pereira
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.106

4.  The association between occupational loading and spine degeneration on imaging - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luciana G Macedo; Michele C Battié
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.