Literature DB >> 1162237

Measurement of spinal mobility: a comparison of three methods.

P M Reynolds.   

Abstract

Three techniques for measuring spinal mobility, with special reference to ankylosing spondylitis --the spondylometer, the goniometer, and a skin of distraction method--are discussed, and their accuracies and feasibilities compared. The spondylometer was found to be the quickest method, but of limited applicability to certain movements only, the goniometer the most versatile and of acceptable accuracy, and the skin distraction method inaccurate and complicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1162237     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/14.3.180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil        ISSN: 0300-3396


  12 in total

1.  Manipulation for low back pain.

Authors:  M Jayson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-01-20

2.  Relation between chest expansion, pulmonary function, and exercise tolerance in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  L R Fisher; M I Cawley; S T Holgate
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Impairment measures in rheumatic disorders for rehabilitation medicine and allied health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raymond A H M Swinkels; Lex M Bouter; Rob A B Oostendorp; Cornelia H M van den Ende
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Controlled trial of mobilisation and manipulation for low back pain: hospital patients.

Authors:  H Sims-Williams; M I Jayson; S M Young; H Baddeley; E Collins
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-11-24

6.  Charge couple device-based system for 3-dimensional real time positioning on the assessment of segmental range of motion of lumbar spine.

Authors:  Ping Zhao; Li-jun Chen; Jing Guan; Li Pan; Hui Ding; Hai-shu Ding
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.978

7.  Current standards for measuring spinal range of motion for impairment.

Authors:  Leanne N Cupon; Warren T Jahn
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2003

8.  Quantitative assessment of the motion of the lumbar spine in the low back pain population and the effect of different spinal pathologies of this motion.

Authors:  A H McGregor; I D McCarthy; C J Doré; S P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Do MRI findings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure.

Authors:  Christoph Quack; Peter Schenk; Thomas Laeubli; Susanne Spillmann; Juerg Hodler; Beat A Michel; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  In-vitro mobility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  R C Hilton; J Ball; R T Benn
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.