Literature DB >> 6634943

Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spinal range of motion.

G K Fitzgerald, K J Wynveen, W Rheault, B Rothschild.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present an assessment method, in conjunction with age-related normal values, for lumbar spinal range of motion. Lumbar flexion, lumbar extension, and right and left lateral flexion were measured on 172 subjects by a combination of goniometry and spinal distraction techniques. Normal values are given for six age groups; each group had a range of 10 years. The results demonstrate that a significant decrease in lumbar spinal range of motion is expected with increasing age. The interobserver reliability based on 17 subjects was substantial for the four measurements taken; coefficients ranged from +.76 to +1.0. The information may prove useful to the clinician as an improved method for assessing the lumbar spine.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6634943     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/63.11.1776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  20 in total

Review 1.  Aggressive exercise as treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Isaac Cohen; James Rainville
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Preliminary study: reliability of the spinal wheel. A novel device to measure spinal postures applied to sitting and standing.

Authors:  Liba Sheeran; Valerie Sparkes; Monica Busse; Robert van Deursen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Quantitative assessment of the motion of the lumbar spine in the low back pain population and the effect of different spinal pathologies of this motion.

Authors:  A H McGregor; I D McCarthy; C J Doré; S P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Do MRI findings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure.

Authors:  Christoph Quack; Peter Schenk; Thomas Laeubli; Susanne Spillmann; Juerg Hodler; Beat A Michel; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Musculoskeletal capacity of middle-aged women and men in physical, mental and mixed occupations. A 3.5-year follow-up.

Authors:  C H Nygård; T Luopajärvi; J Ilmarinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988

6.  The modified total body rotation test: a rapid, reliable assessment of physical function in older adults.

Authors:  Damian C Stanziano; Joseph F Signorile; Sara Mow; Erin E Davidson; Joseph G Ouslander; Bernard A Roos
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Comparative evaluation of a novel measurement tool to assess lumbar spine posture and range of motion.

Authors:  Tobias Consmüller; Antonius Rohlmann; Daniel Weinland; Claudia Druschel; Georg N Duda; William R Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Management of the herniated lumbar disc: the outcome after chemonucleolysis, surgical disc excision and conservative treatments.

Authors:  A Abdel-Salam; K S Eyres; J Cleary
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Lumbar spine flexion and extension extremes of motion in women of different age and racial groups: the WIN Study.

Authors:  Elaine Trudelle-Jackson; Lisa Ann Fleisher; Nicole Borman; James R Morrow; Georita M Frierson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES.

Authors:  Carla Chertman; Humberto Maldonado Campoy Dos Santos; Leonardo Pires; Marcelo Wajchenberg; Delio Eulúlio Martins; Eduardo Barros Puertas
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.