Literature DB >> 3703932

Reliability and validity of four instruments for measuring lumbar spine and pelvic positions.

R G Burdett, K E Brown, M P Fall.   

Abstract

We studied the between-therapist reliability and the validity of four instruments in measuring lumbar spine curvature and pelvic tilt. The four instruments and their measurements were 1) a tape measure to measure the change in lumbar curvature during trunk flexion; 2) a gravity goniometer to measure pelvic angle and lumbar curvature during stance, trunk flexion, and trunk extension; 3) a parallelogram goniometer to measure lumbar curvature during stance, trunk flexion, and trunk extension; and 4) a standard goniometer to measure the angle between wooden pointers mounted perpendicularly to the spine to obtain pelvic angle and lumbar curvature during stance, trunk flexion, and trunk extension. We found no single instrument to be the most reliable or valid. Between-therapist reliability ranged from .64 to .93 (Pearson product-moment correlation) and from .60 to .92 (interclass correlation coefficient). The validities of the instruments compared with measurements from roentgenograms generally were low, ranging from -.13 to .76 (Pearson product-moment correlation) and -.73 to -.05 (interclass correlation coefficient).

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3703932     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/66.5.677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  16 in total

Review 1.  Aggressive exercise as treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Isaac Cohen; James Rainville
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Current standards for measuring spinal range of motion for impairment.

Authors:  Leanne N Cupon; Warren T Jahn
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2003

3.  Do MRI findings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure.

Authors:  Christoph Quack; Peter Schenk; Thomas Laeubli; Susanne Spillmann; Juerg Hodler; Beat A Michel; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Musculoskeletal capacity of middle-aged women and men in physical, mental and mixed occupations. A 3.5-year follow-up.

Authors:  C H Nygård; T Luopajärvi; J Ilmarinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988

5.  The impact of chronic low back pain on older adults: a comparative study of patients and controls.

Authors:  Thomas E Rudy; Debra K Weiner; Susan J Lieber; Jill Slaboda; Robert J Boston
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 7.926

6.  Inertial measures of motion for clinical biomechanics: comparative assessment of accuracy under controlled conditions - changes in accuracy over time.

Authors:  Karina Lebel; Patrick Boissy; Mathieu Hamel; Christian Duval
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Measurement of lumbosacral angle in normal radiographs: a retrospective study in southeast Nigeria.

Authors:  Fo Okpala
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-09

8.  The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system.

Authors:  Maria Moutzouri; Evdokia Billis; Nikolaos Strimpakos; Polixeni Kottika; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Plastic optical fibre sensor for spine bending monitoring with power fluctuation compensation.

Authors:  Mohd Anwar Zawawi; Sinead O'Keeffe; Elfed Lewis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Test-re-test reliability and inter-rater reliability of a digital pelvic inclinometer in young, healthy males and females.

Authors:  Chris Beardsley; Tim Egerton; Brendon Skinner
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.