Literature DB >> 17136169

Pharmacy student response to patient-simulation mannequins to teach performance-based pharmacotherapeutics.

Amy L Seybert1, Karen K Laughlin, Neal J Benedict, Christine M Barton, Rhonda S Rea.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To design and implement a simulated patient-case assessment using a mannequin for critical care pharmacotherapeutic education of doctor of pharmacy students and to evaluate student satisfaction with the simulation.
DESIGN: During the second year of the doctor of pharmacy program, all students were required to complete Introduction to Critical Care. This course consisted of didactic education, written patient-case sessions, and an interactive patient simulation session. Information on the patient case was distributed to students after completing the didactic portion of the course. Patient information was programmed into a simulation mannequin, which demonstrated characteristics of a critically ill human. Students were surveyed post-simulation to determine the effectiveness of the learning experience. ASSESSMENT: The majority of students (88%) were extremely satisfied with the experience. The facilitator was considered to be extremely useful in 75% of responses.
CONCLUSION: By simulating a patient case, the facilitator was able to control students' learning environment, adapt the simulation to the level of the students' performance, and debrief students immediately. Ultimately, by involving students in actual patient cases early in the pharmacy curriculum, this type of education could produce pharmacists with a high level of expertise and confidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17136169      PMCID: PMC1636957          DOI: 10.5688/aj700348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  8 in total

1.  Virtual PBL: full-scale human simulation technology.

Authors:  J A Tome; J Fletcher
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Quantifying learning in medical students during a critical care medicine elective: a comparison of three evaluation instruments.

Authors:  P L Rogers; H Jacob; A S Rashwan; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Experience with medical student simulation education.

Authors:  William R McIvor
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  From Resusci-Anne to Sim-Man: the evolution of simulators in medicine.

Authors:  Ake Grenvik; John Schaefer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  National Medical Simulation training program in Denmark.

Authors:  Doris Ostergaard
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Virtual simulated patients for bioterrorism preparedness training.

Authors:  Paul N Kizakevich; Linda Lux; Steve Duncan; Curry Guinn; Michael L McCartrey
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2003

7.  Likert scales: how to (ab)use them.

Authors:  Susan Jamieson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Using simulation technology for undergraduate nursing education.

Authors:  Catherine F Medley; Claydell Horne
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.726

  8 in total
  40 in total

1.  Computer-based simulation training to improve learning outcomes in mannequin-based simulation exercises.

Authors:  Lindsay B Curtin; Laura A Finn; Quinn A Czosnowski; Craig B Whitman; Michael J Cawley
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Integration of physical assessment within a pathophysiology course for pharmacy.

Authors:  Christian B Albano; Wendy Brown
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Student measurement of blood pressure using a simulator arm compared with a live subject's arm.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lee; Diana M Sobieraj; Effie L Kuti
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Simulation-based learning to teach blood pressure assessment to doctor of pharmacy students.

Authors:  Amy L Seybert; Christine M Barton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Assessing pharmacy students' ability to accurately measure blood pressure using a blood pressure simulator arm.

Authors:  Michelle M Bottenberg; Ginelle A Bryant; Sally L Haack; Andrew M North
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Redesign and evaluation of a patient assessment course.

Authors:  Diana M Sobieraj; Desmond McCaffrey; Jennifer J Lee
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Interprofessional education among student health professionals using human patient simulation.

Authors:  Scott Bolesta; Joyce V Chmil
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  High-fidelity simulation training in advanced resuscitation for pharmacy residents.

Authors:  Amy J Eng; Jennifer M Namba; Kevin W Box; James R Lane; Dennis Y Kim; Daniel P Davis; Jay J Doucet; Raul Coimbra
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Preparing pharmacy graduates for traditional and emerging career opportunities.

Authors:  Gayle A Brazeau; Susan M Meyer; Michele Belsey; Edward M Bednarczyk; Sanela Bilic; Julie Bullock; Gary E DeLander; E F Fiese; Stephen L Giroux; Danny McNatty; Ruth Nemire; William A Prescott; Andrew P Traynor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Retention of advanced cardiac life support knowledge and skills following high-fidelity mannequin simulation training.

Authors:  Angela L Bingham; Sanchita Sen; Laura A Finn; Michael J Cawley
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.