OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of computer-based simulation on the achievement of student learning outcomes during mannequin-based simulation. DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to rapid response teams of 5-6 students and then teams were randomly assigned to either a group that completed either computer-based or mannequin-based simulation cases first. In both simulations, students used their critical thinking skills and selected interventions independent of facilitator input. ASSESSMENT: A predetermined rubric was used to record and assess students' performance in the mannequin-based simulations. Feedback and student performance scores were generated by the software in the computer-based simulations. More of the teams in the group that completed the computer-based simulation before completing the mannequin-based simulation achieved the primary outcome for the exercise, which was survival of the simulated patient (41.2% vs. 5.6%). The majority of students (>90%) recommended the continuation of simulation exercises in the course. Students in both groups felt the computer-based simulation should be completed prior to the mannequin-based simulation. CONCLUSION: The use of computer-based simulation prior to mannequin-based simulation improved the achievement of learning goals and outcomes. In addition to improving participants' skills, completing the computer-based simulation first may improve participants' confidence during the more real-life setting achieved in the mannequin-based simulation.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of computer-based simulation on the achievement of student learning outcomes during mannequin-based simulation. DESIGN:Participants were randomly assigned to rapid response teams of 5-6 students and then teams were randomly assigned to either a group that completed either computer-based or mannequin-based simulation cases first. In both simulations, students used their critical thinking skills and selected interventions independent of facilitator input. ASSESSMENT: A predetermined rubric was used to record and assess students' performance in the mannequin-based simulations. Feedback and student performance scores were generated by the software in the computer-based simulations. More of the teams in the group that completed the computer-based simulation before completing the mannequin-based simulation achieved the primary outcome for the exercise, which was survival of the simulated patient (41.2% vs. 5.6%). The majority of students (>90%) recommended the continuation of simulation exercises in the course. Students in both groups felt the computer-based simulation should be completed prior to the mannequin-based simulation. CONCLUSION: The use of computer-based simulation prior to mannequin-based simulation improved the achievement of learning goals and outcomes. In addition to improving participants' skills, completing the computer-based simulation first may improve participants' confidence during the more real-life setting achieved in the mannequin-based simulation.
Entities:
Keywords:
active learning; advanced cardiac life support; instructional design; resuscitation; simulation
Authors: Randolph H Steadman; Wendy C Coates; Yue Ming Huang; Rima Matevosian; Baxter R Larmon; Lynne McCullough; Danit Ariel Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Amy L Seybert; Karen K Laughlin; Neal J Benedict; Christine M Barton; Rhonda S Rea Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Nancy M Tofil; Kim W Benner; Mary A Worthington; Lynn Zinkan; Marjorie Lee White Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Whitney D Maxwell; Phillip L Mohorn; Jason S Haney; Cynthia M Phillips; Z Kevin Lu; Kimberly Clark; Alex Corboy; Kelly R Ragucci Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Ghazwa B Korayem; Omar A Alshaya; Sawsan M Kurdi; Lina I Alnajjar; Aisha F Badr; Amjaad Alfahed; Ameera Cluntun Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract Date: 2022-07-01