SUMMARY: The standard diagnostic technique for assessing osteoporosis is dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measuring bone mass parameters. In this study, a combination of DXA and trabecular structure parameters (acquired by computed tomography [CT]) most accurately predicted the biomechanical strength of the proximal femur and allowed for a better prediction than DXA alone. INTRODUCTION: An automated 3D segmentation algorithm was applied to determine specific structure parameters of the trabecular bone in CT images of the proximal femur. This was done to evaluate the ability of these parameters for predicting biomechanical femoral bone strength in comparison with bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) acquired by DXA as standard diagnostic technique. METHODS: One hundred eighty-seven proximal femur specimens were harvested from formalin-fixed human cadavers. BMC and BMD were determined by DXA. Structure parameters of the trabecular bone (i.e., morphometry, fuzzy logic, Minkowski functionals, and the scaling index method [SIM]) were computed from CT images. Absolute femoral bone strength was assessed with a biomechanical side-impact test measuring failure load (FL). Adjusted FL parameters for appraisal of relative bone strength were calculated by dividing FL by influencing variables such as body height, weight, or femoral head diameter. RESULTS: The best single parameter predicting FL and adjusted FL parameters was apparent trabecular separation (morphometry) or DXA-derived BMC or BMD with correlations up to r = 0.802. In combination with DXA, structure parameters (most notably the SIM and morphometry) added in linear regression models significant information in predicting FL and all adjusted FL parameters (up to R(adj) = 0.872) and allowed for a significant better prediction than DXA alone. CONCLUSION: A combination of bone mass (DXA) and structure parameters of the trabecular bone (linear and nonlinear, global and local) most accurately predicted absolute and relative femoral bone strength.
SUMMARY: The standard diagnostic technique for assessing osteoporosis is dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measuring bone mass parameters. In this study, a combination of DXA and trabecular structure parameters (acquired by computed tomography [CT]) most accurately predicted the biomechanical strength of the proximal femur and allowed for a better prediction than DXA alone. INTRODUCTION: An automated 3D segmentation algorithm was applied to determine specific structure parameters of the trabecular bone in CT images of the proximal femur. This was done to evaluate the ability of these parameters for predicting biomechanical femoral bone strength in comparison with bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) acquired by DXA as standard diagnostic technique. METHODS: One hundred eighty-seven proximal femur specimens were harvested from formalin-fixed human cadavers. BMC and BMD were determined by DXA. Structure parameters of the trabecular bone (i.e., morphometry, fuzzy logic, Minkowski functionals, and the scaling index method [SIM]) were computed from CT images. Absolute femoral bone strength was assessed with a biomechanical side-impact test measuring failure load (FL). Adjusted FL parameters for appraisal of relative bone strength were calculated by dividing FL by influencing variables such as body height, weight, or femoral head diameter. RESULTS: The best single parameter predicting FL and adjusted FL parameters was apparent trabecular separation (morphometry) or DXA-derived BMC or BMD with correlations up to r = 0.802. In combination with DXA, structure parameters (most notably the SIM and morphometry) added in linear regression models significant information in predicting FL and all adjusted FL parameters (up to R(adj) = 0.872) and allowed for a significant better prediction than DXA alone. CONCLUSION: A combination of bone mass (DXA) and structure parameters of the trabecular bone (linear and nonlinear, global and local) most accurately predicted absolute and relative femoral bone strength.
Authors: Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Christoph A Lill; Volker Kuhn; Erich Schneider; Günter Delling; Ralph Müller Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Thomas M Link; Volker Vieth; Christoph Stehling; Albrecht Lotter; Ambros Beer; David Newitt; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2002-09-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ralph Müller; Volker Kuhn; Christoph A Lill; Felix Eckstein Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: H F Boehm; C Raeth; R A Monetti; D Mueller; D Newitt; S Majumdar; E Rummeny; G Morfill; T M Link Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Ahi Sema Issever; Volker Vieth; Albrecht Lotter; Norbert Meier; Andres Laib; David Newitt; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Dennis M Black; Susan L Greenspan; Kristine E Ensrud; Lisa Palermo; Joan A McGowan; Thomas F Lang; Patrick Garnero; Mary L Bouxsein; John P Bilezikian; Clifford J Rosen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas Baum; Melanie Kutscher; Dirk Müller; Christoph Räth; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: Ardiyansyah Syahrom; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Jaafar Abdullah; Andreas Öchsner Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2011-09-24 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Chien-Chun Yang; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Markus B Huber; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Felix Eckstein; Eva Lochmüller; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link; Axel Wismüller Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2013-03
Authors: Chien-Chun Yang; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Markus B Huber; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Thomas M Link; Axel Wismüller Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2014-03-13
Authors: Mahesh B Nagarajan; Walter A Checefsky; Anas Z Abidin; Halley Tsai; Xixi Wang; Susan K Hobbs; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Axel Wismüller Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2015-03-17
Authors: Walter A Checefsky; Anas Z Abidin; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Axel Wismüller Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2016-03-24