Literature DB >> 19859642

Automated 3D trabecular bone structure analysis of the proximal femur--prediction of biomechanical strength by CT and DXA.

T Baum1, J Carballido-Gamio, M B Huber, D Müller, R Monetti, C Räth, F Eckstein, E M Lochmüller, S Majumdar, E J Rummeny, T M Link, J S Bauer.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: The standard diagnostic technique for assessing osteoporosis is dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measuring bone mass parameters. In this study, a combination of DXA and trabecular structure parameters (acquired by computed tomography [CT]) most accurately predicted the biomechanical strength of the proximal femur and allowed for a better prediction than DXA alone.
INTRODUCTION: An automated 3D segmentation algorithm was applied to determine specific structure parameters of the trabecular bone in CT images of the proximal femur. This was done to evaluate the ability of these parameters for predicting biomechanical femoral bone strength in comparison with bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) acquired by DXA as standard diagnostic technique.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-seven proximal femur specimens were harvested from formalin-fixed human cadavers. BMC and BMD were determined by DXA. Structure parameters of the trabecular bone (i.e., morphometry, fuzzy logic, Minkowski functionals, and the scaling index method [SIM]) were computed from CT images. Absolute femoral bone strength was assessed with a biomechanical side-impact test measuring failure load (FL). Adjusted FL parameters for appraisal of relative bone strength were calculated by dividing FL by influencing variables such as body height, weight, or femoral head diameter.
RESULTS: The best single parameter predicting FL and adjusted FL parameters was apparent trabecular separation (morphometry) or DXA-derived BMC or BMD with correlations up to r = 0.802. In combination with DXA, structure parameters (most notably the SIM and morphometry) added in linear regression models significant information in predicting FL and all adjusted FL parameters (up to R(adj) = 0.872) and allowed for a significant better prediction than DXA alone.
CONCLUSION: A combination of bone mass (DXA) and structure parameters of the trabecular bone (linear and nonlinear, global and local) most accurately predicted absolute and relative femoral bone strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19859642      PMCID: PMC2912724          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1090-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  42 in total

1.  Bone strength at clinically relevant sites displays substantial heterogeneity and is best predicted from site-specific bone densitometry.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Christoph A Lill; Volker Kuhn; Erich Schneider; Günter Delling; Ralph Müller
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Predictive value of bone mineral density and morphology determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography for cancellous bone strength of the proximal femur.

Authors:  N J Wachter; P Augat; M Mentzel; M R Sarkar; G D Krischak; L Kinzl; L E Claes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best?

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Volker Vieth; Christoph Stehling; Albrecht Lotter; Ambros Beer; David Newitt; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Structure analysis of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal femur: in vitro correlation with biomechanical strength and BMD.

Authors:  T M Link; V Vieth; R Langenberg; N Meier; A Lotter; D Newitt; S Majumdar
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Correlation of bone mineral density with strength and microstructural parameters of cortical bone in vitro.

Authors:  N J Wachter; G D Krischak; M Mentzel; M R Sarkar; T Ebinger; L Kinzl; L Claes; P Augat
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Can novel clinical densitometric techniques replace or improve DXA in predicting bone strength in osteoporosis at the hip and other skeletal sites?

Authors:  Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ralph Müller; Volker Kuhn; Christoph A Lill; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Local 3D scaling properties for the analysis of trabecular bone extracted from high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of human trabecular bone: comparison with bone mineral density in the prediction of biomechanical strength in vitro.

Authors:  H F Boehm; C Raeth; R A Monetti; D Mueller; D Newitt; S Majumdar; E Rummeny; G Morfill; T M Link
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Local differences in the trabecular bone structure of the proximal femur depicted with high-spatial-resolution MR imaging and multisection CT.

Authors:  Ahi Sema Issever; Volker Vieth; Albrecht Lotter; Norbert Meier; Andres Laib; David Newitt; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.

Authors:  Masahiko Bessho; Isao Ohnishi; Juntaro Matsuyama; Takuya Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Imai; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The effects of parathyroid hormone and alendronate alone or in combination in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Dennis M Black; Susan L Greenspan; Kristine E Ensrud; Lisa Palermo; Joan A McGowan; Thomas F Lang; Patrick Garnero; Mary L Bouxsein; John P Bilezikian; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  25 in total

1.  Vertebral body bone strength: the contribution of individual trabecular element morphology.

Authors:  I H Parkinson; A Badiei; M Stauber; J Codrington; R Müller; N L Fazzalari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Cortical and trabecular bone structure analysis at the distal radius-prediction of biomechanical strength by DXA and MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Melanie Kutscher; Dirk Müller; Christoph Räth; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  CT-based evaluation of volumetric bone density in fragility fractures of the pelvis-a matched case-control analysis.

Authors:  D Schönenberg; R Guggenberger; D Frey; H-C Pape; H-P Simmen; G Osterhoff
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Mechanical and microarchitectural analyses of cancellous bone through experiment and computer simulation.

Authors:  Ardiyansyah Syahrom; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Jaafar Abdullah; Andreas Öchsner
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Predicting the Biomechanical Strength of Proximal Femur Specimens through High Dimensional Geometric Features and Support Vector Regression.

Authors:  Chien-Chun Yang; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Markus B Huber; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Felix Eckstein; Eva Lochmüller; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-03

6.  Predicting the Biomechanical Strength of Proximal Femur Specimens with Minkowski Functionals and Support Vector Regression.

Authors:  Chien-Chun Yang; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Markus B Huber; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Thomas M Link; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-13

7.  Using Anisotropic 3D Minkowski Functionals for Trabecular Bone Characterization and Biomechanical Strength Prediction in Proximal Femur Specimens.

Authors:  Mahesh B Nagarajan; Titas De; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Felix Eckstein; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-04-09

8.  Feasibility of cone beam computed tomography radiomorphometric analysis and fractal dimension in assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in correlation with dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Raghdaa A Mostafa; Eman A Arnout; Mona M Abo El-Fotouh
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Characterizing Trabecular Bone structure for Assessing Vertebral Fracture Risk on Volumetric Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Mahesh B Nagarajan; Walter A Checefsky; Anas Z Abidin; Halley Tsai; Xixi Wang; Susan K Hobbs; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-17

10.  Assessing vertebral fracture risk on volumetric quantitative computed tomography by geometric characterization of trabecular bone structure.

Authors:  Walter A Checefsky; Anas Z Abidin; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.