Literature DB >> 25247158

Efficacy of Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Evaluation of Biomechanical Properties: Bone Mineral Density and Actual Bone Strength.

Sung Hwa Seo1, Joomi Lee2, Il Hyung Park3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bone mineral density (BMD) is an important index in diagnosis of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases, prediction of fractures, and monitoring treatment. This study was to find a more feasible technique for prediction of osteoporotic fracture between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and to reveal the actual change of bone strength when BMD was changed.
METHODS: Ten of these 20 specimens were used as the demineralized group and the other 10 as the control. Each specimen was immersed in HCl solution at for a period of at least 10 minutes, up to 100 minutes, at an interval of 10 minutes for different levels of demineralization. BMD was measured using DXA and QCT. Uniaxial compression tests were conducted to measure biomechanical parameters. Pearson correlation analysis was used respectively between BMD and biomechanical parameters and between DXA and QCT.
RESULTS: Elastic modulus (r=0.87) and yield stress (r=0.84) showed a statistically significant correlation with DXA BMD. Through correlation analysis with QCT BMD and elastic modulus, correlation coefficient showed hemi-vertebra (r=0.80) and trabecular (r=0.68). In yield stress, there was a statistically significant correlation in hemi-vertebra (r=0.87) and trabecular bone (r=0.84).
CONCLUSION: DXA is a current standard technique not only for diagnosis of osteoporosis but also for prediction of fracture risk compared to QCT. Actual decrease of bone strength was much greater than that of BMD by both DXA and QCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absorptiometry photon; Biomechanical phenomena; Bone density; Osteoporosis

Year:  2014        PMID: 25247158      PMCID: PMC4170083          DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2014.21.3.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Metab        ISSN: 2287-6375


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue.

Authors:  Harun H Bayraktar; Elise F Morgan; Glen L Niebur; Grayson E Morris; Eric K Wong; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Influence of different sterilization procedures and partial demineralization of screws made of bone on their mechanical properties.

Authors:  A B Actis; J A Obwegeser; C Rupérez
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.646

3.  Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  Klaus Engelke; Judith E Adams; Gabriele Armbrecht; Peter Augat; Cesar E Bogado; Mary L Bouxsein; Dieter Felsenberg; Masako Ito; Sven Prevrhal; Didier B Hans; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  A comparison of spinal quantitative computed tomography with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in European women with vertebral and nonvertebral fractures.

Authors:  C Bergot; A M Laval-Jeantet; K Hutchinson; I Dautraix; F Caulin; H K Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Mortality after vertebral fracture in Korea: analysis of the National Claim Registry.

Authors:  Y-K Lee; S Jang; S Jang; H J Lee; C Park; Y-C Ha; D-Y Kim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone.

Authors:  R W Goulet; S A Goldstein; M J Ciarelli; J L Kuhn; M B Brown; L A Feldkamp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  A method to develop an in vitro osteoporosis model of porcine vertebrae: histological and biomechanical study.

Authors:  Ching-yi Lee; She-Hung Chan; Hung-Yi Lai; Shih-Tseng Lee
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-03-11

9.  Proximal femoral structure and the prediction of hip fracture in men: a large prospective study using QCT.

Authors:  Dennis M Black; Mary L Bouxsein; Lynn M Marshall; Steven R Cummings; Thomas F Lang; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Carrie M Nielson; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Hardness, an indicator of the mechanical competence of cancellous bone.

Authors:  R Hodgskinson; J D Currey; G P Evans
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  3 in total

1.  Standardizing compression testing for measuring the stiffness of human bone.

Authors:  S Zhao; M Arnold; S Ma; R L Abel; J P Cobb; U Hansen; O Boughton
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.853

2.  Monitoring bone changes due to calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus loss in rat femurs using Quantitative Ultrasound.

Authors:  Aldo Fontes-Pereira; Paulo Rosa; Thiago Barboza; Daniel Matusin; Aline Soares Freire; Bernardo Ferreira Braz; Christiano Bittencourt Machado; Marco Antônio von Krüger; Sergio Augusto Lopes de Souza; Ricardo Erthal Santelli; Wagner Coelho de Albuquerque Pereira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Computed tomography porosity and spherical indentation for determining cortical bone millimetre-scale mechanical properties.

Authors:  Oliver R Boughton; Shaocheng Ma; Xiran Cai; Liye Yan; Laura Peralta; Pascal Laugier; James Marrow; Finn Giuliani; Ulrich Hansen; Richard L Abel; Quentin Grimal; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.