Literature DB >> 17094982

Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study.

Patricia Hershberger1, Susan C Klock, Randall B Barnes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the controversy surrounding disclosure among donor oocyte recipients. This controversy is escalating worldwide, yet little research has sought to understand the disclosure experience of pregnant, donor oocyte recipient women. This study aims to provide an in-depth description of the disclosure experience, and identify factors that were significant to recipient women which influenced their reasoning as they formulated disclosure decisions.
DESIGN: Qualitative, naturalistic design, using a phenomenological approach.
SETTING: The home or private office of the recipient woman. PATIENT(S): Donor oocyte recipient women between 9-23 weeks of gestation. RESULT(S): Disclosure decisions were influenced by multiple factors emerging from the women's values and beliefs and their social and cultural environment. Values and beliefs consisted of the right to know and the duty to protect. Social and cultural factors included social support, culture of the family, evolution of the social process, and personal testimonials. Women's age and selection of donor type were interrelated with disclosure decisions. CONCLUSION(S): Disclosing women voiced the right of the child to know, and perceived social and cultural factors as conducive to disclosure. Nondisclosing and undecided women emphasized protecting normative relationships, perceived a social stigma, and were unable to identify a benefit to disclosing. Women's age and choice of oocyte donor should be considered when counseling recipient women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17094982      PMCID: PMC1864942          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  32 in total

1.  Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes.

Authors:  P Baetens; P Devroey; M Camus; A C Van Steirteghem; I Ponjaert-Kristoffersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Using qualitative research.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2004-12

3.  Social versus biological parenting: family functioning and the socioemotional development of children conceived by egg or sperm donation.

Authors:  S Golombok; C Murray; P Brinsden; H Abdalla
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 4.  Gamete donation and anonymity: disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optional.

Authors:  G McGee; S V Brakman; A D Gurmankin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Gamete donation and anonymity: disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should be optional.

Authors:  P Patrizio; A C Mastroianni; L Mastroianni
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Parental attitudes toward disclosure of the mode of conception to their child conceived by in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Catherine Peters; Xenya Kantaris; Jacqueline Barnes; Alastair Sutcliffe
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Gamete donation: a question of anonymity.

Authors:  Christopher De Jonge; Christopher L R Barratt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents' disclosure patterns.

Authors:  E Lycett; K Daniels; R Curson; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents?

Authors:  A McWhinnie
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Psychological aspects of donor insemination: evaluation and follow-up of recipient couples.

Authors:  L R Schover; R L Collins; S Richards
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  15 in total

1.  Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges.

Authors:  Natacha Salomé Lima
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Donor Conception and "Passing," or; Why Australian Parents of Donor-Conceived Children Want Donors Who Look Like Them.

Authors:  Karen-Anne Wong
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Alpha Test of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Agatha M Gallo; Kirby Adlam; Alana D Steffen; Martha Driessnack; Harold D Grotevant; Susan C Klock; Lauri Pasch; Valerie Gruss
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2022-07-31

4.  Enhancing pregnant, donor oocyte recipient women's health in the infertility clinic and beyond: a phenomenological investigation of caring behaviour.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Karen Kavanaugh
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 5.  Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring:a search for facts.

Authors:  M Visser; P A L Kop; M van Wely; F van der Veen; G J E Gerrits; M C B van Zwieten
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

6.  How much is a child worth? Providers' and patients' views and responses concerning ethical and policy challenges in paying for ART.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Unconventional combinations of prospective parents: ethical challenges faced by IVF providers.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Nine centuries waiting: The experiences of Iranians surrogacy commissioning mothers.

Authors:  Mitra Zandi; Zohreh Vanaki; Marziyeh Shiva; Eesa Mohammadi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-05

9.  It takes two to tango: information-sharing with offspring among heterosexual parents following identity-release sperm donation.

Authors:  S Isaksson; A Skoog-Svanberg; G Sydsjö; L Linell; C Lampic
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Buying and selling human eggs: infertility providers' ethical and other concerns regarding egg donor agencies.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.