Literature DB >> 10655327

Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes.

P Baetens1, P Devroey, M Camus, A C Van Steirteghem, I Ponjaert-Kristoffersen.   

Abstract

In order to avoid a long waiting period, the Centre for Reproductive Medicine of the Free University of Brussels suggests that couples in need of donor oocytes search for a donor among family and friends. Recipient couples can choose between two types of donation: known donation, i.e. treatment with the oocytes of the donor recruited by the couple, or anonymous donation, i.e. an exchange of the donor recruited by the couple with a donor recruited by another couple in order to ensure anonymity between donor and recipients. In total, 144 couples were counselled by a psychologist in the decision-making process with regard to the kind of donation to be used. Some 68.8% of the recipient couples preferred known donation. This choice was mainly motivated by reasons related to fears associated with anonymity, such as fear of the unknown origin of genetic material and the trust that couples had in 'their' donor. Almost one-third of the couples opted to use anonymous oocytes. The desire to establish explicit boundaries between the two families involved was the major motivation for this choice. Approximately 44% of the couples were willing to tell the child about the oocyte donation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10655327     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.2.476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  14 in total

1.  Reproductive tourism as moral pluralism in motion.

Authors:  G Pennings
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Intra-Family Gamete Donation: A Solution to Concerns Regarding Gamete Donation in China?

Authors:  Juhong Liao; Katrien Devolder
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Patricia Hershberger; Susan C Klock; Randall B Barnes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy.

Authors:  Jennifer Readings; Lucy Blake; Polly Casey; Vasanti Jadva; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  'Daddy ran out of tadpoles': how parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-year-olds understand.

Authors:  L Blake; P Casey; J Readings; V Jadva; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Distributive justice in the allocation of donor oocytes.

Authors:  G Pennings
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Ethical aspects of the use of stem cell derived gametes for reproduction.

Authors:  Heidi Mertes; Guido Pennings
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-10-07

Review 8.  Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring:a search for facts.

Authors:  M Visser; P A L Kop; M van Wely; F van der Veen; G J E Gerrits; M C B van Zwieten
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

9.  Attitudes towards embryo donation in Swedish women and men of reproductive age.

Authors:  Kjell Wånggren; Frida Prag; Agneta Skoog Svanberg
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.384

10.  Disclosure of sperm donation: a comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman; Sophie Zadeh; Venessa Smith; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 3.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.