Literature DB >> 11574486

Gamete donation and anonymity: disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optional.

G McGee1, S V Brakman, A D Gurmankin.   

Abstract

The use of donor gametes in reproductive technology raises ethical, psychological and social questions that have been significant for the practice of adoption: that is, when, or if, to disclose biological origin to the child. The current wisdom is that adopted children should be told by their parents as early as possible that the family was created through adoption, and we argue that the same model should apply to the use of donor gametes. We argue that privacy concerns or other goals of parents who would prefer to avoid disclosure are outweighed by the negative consequences of holding such family secrets and by the child's right to, and medical need for, information about his/her origin. We believe fertility programmes and professional organizations ought to strongly encourage those using donor gametes to tell their child of their true origin as early as the child can understand reproduction in general.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11574486     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.10.2033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

1.  Children conceived by gamete donation: psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7.

Authors:  Susan Golombok; Jennifer Readings; Lucy Blake; Polly Casey; Laura Mellish; Alex Marks; Vasanti Jadva
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2011-04

2.  Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Patricia Hershberger; Susan C Klock; Randall B Barnes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Psychological adjustment in adolescents conceived by assisted reproduction techniques: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elena Cristiana Ilioi; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Donor Conception Disclosure: Directive or Non-Directive Counselling?

Authors:  Inez Raes; An Ravelingien; Guido Pennings
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm : do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction?

Authors:  Damian H Adams
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Regulating Gamete Donation in the U.S.: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello
Journal:  Laws       Date:  2015-09

Review 7.  Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring:a search for facts.

Authors:  M Visser; P A L Kop; M van Wely; F van der Veen; G J E Gerrits; M C B van Zwieten
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

8.  The right to know one's genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Vardit Ravitsky
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2017-01-16

9.  Italian law on medically assisted reproduction: do women's autonomy and health matter?

Authors:  Irene Riezzo; Margherita Neri; Stefania Bello; Cristoforo Pomara; Emanuela Turillazzi
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Mitochondrial donation and 'the right to know'.

Authors:  Reuven Brandt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.