Literature DB >> 15677680

School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents' disclosure patterns.

E Lycett1, K Daniels, R Curson, S Golombok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A major concern in relation to donor insemination (DI) is whether children should be told about their genetic origins. This study compared the thoughts, feelings and experiences of DI parents who were inclined towards openness with those who were inclined towards non-disclosure.
METHODS: Forty-six families with a 4- to 8-year-old DI-conceived child were interviewed about their decision, their reasons and subsequent concerns regarding disclosure.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of parents were inclined towards disclosure whilst the remaining 61% were not. The two main reasons for favouring disclosure were to avoid accidental discovery and a desire for openness. Non-disclosing parents felt that there was no reason to tell and wished to protect family members. The children who had been told reacted with either curiosity or disinterest.
CONCLUSIONS: In spite of donor anonymity, parents who were intending to tell their child in the future had optimistic expectations of their child's reaction. Parents who had already told their child generally described the telling experience as a positive one.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15677680     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  17 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of recipients' views and experiences of intra-family egg donation.

Authors:  V Jadva; P Casey; J Readings; L Blake; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

3.  Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes.

Authors:  Kirstin Mac Dougall; Gay Becker; Joanna E Scheib; Robert D Nachtigall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Assisted reproduction: what factors interfere in the professional's decisions? Are single women an issue?

Authors:  Suzana Záchia; Daniela Knauth; José R Goldim; Juliana R Chachamovich; Eduardo Chachamovich; Ana H Paz; Ricardo Felberbaum; PierGiorgio Crosignani; Basil C Tarlatzis; Eduardo P Passos
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Patricia Hershberger; Susan C Klock; Randall B Barnes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy.

Authors:  Jennifer Readings; Lucy Blake; Polly Casey; Vasanti Jadva; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  'Daddy ran out of tadpoles': how parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-year-olds understand.

Authors:  L Blake; P Casey; J Readings; V Jadva; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Psychological adjustment in adolescents conceived by assisted reproduction techniques: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elena Cristiana Ilioi; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  The impact of culture on disclosure in differences of sex development.

Authors:  Erica M Weidler; Karen E Peterson
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm : do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction?

Authors:  Damian H Adams
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 1.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.