Literature DB >> 17072608

Visual motion combined with base of support width reveals variable field dependency in healthy young adults.

Jefferson W Streepey1, Robert V Kenyon, Emily A Keshner.   

Abstract

We previously reported responses to induced postural instability in young healthy individuals viewing visual motion with a narrow (25 degrees in both directions) and wide (90 degrees and 55 degrees in the horizontal and vertical directions) field of view (FOV) as they stood on different sized blocks. Visual motion was achieved using an immersive virtual environment that moved realistically with head motion (natural motion) and translated sinusoidally at 0.1 Hz in the fore-aft direction (augmented motion). We observed that a subset of the subjects (steppers) could not maintain continuous stance on the smallest block when the virtual environment was in motion. We completed a posteriori analyses on the postural responses of the steppers and non-steppers that may inform us about the mechanisms underlying these differences in stability. We found that when viewing augmented motion with a wide FOV, there was a greater effect on the head and whole body center of mass and ankle angle root mean square (RMS) values of the steppers than of the non-steppers. FFT analyses revealed greater power at the frequency of the visual stimulus in the steppers compared to the non-steppers. Whole body COM time lags relative to the augmented visual scene revealed that the time-delay between the scene and the COM was significantly increased in the steppers. The increased responsiveness to visual information suggests a greater visual field-dependency of the steppers and suggests that the thresholds for shifting from a reliance on visual information to somatosensory information can differ even within a healthy population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17072608     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0677-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Body sway induced by depth linear vection in reference to central and peripheral visual field.

Authors:  T Kawakita; S Kuno; Y Miyake; S Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  2000-06

2.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Field dependence and body balance.

Authors:  F Kitamura; K Matsunaga
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1990-12

4.  The influence of head rotation on human upright posture during balanced bilateral vibration.

Authors:  V S Gurfinkel; Y P Ivanenko; Y S Levik
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1995-12-29       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Selection of spatial frame of reference and postural control variability.

Authors:  B Isableu; T Ohlmann; J Cremieux; B Amblard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Differential approach to strategies of segmental stabilisation in postural control.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Théophile Ohlmann; Jacques Crémieux; Bernard Amblard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance.

Authors:  T A Stoffregen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The autonomy of visual kinaesthesis.

Authors:  J R Lishman; D N Lee
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Contribution of neck proprioception to subjective vertical perception among experts in physical activities and untrained women.

Authors:  Eveline Golomer; Emmanuel Guillou; Marc Testa; Charles Lecoq; Théophile Ohlmann
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  15 in total

1.  Relationship between the level of mental fatigue induced by a prolonged cognitive task and the degree of balance disturbance.

Authors:  Frédéric Noé; Betty Hachard; Hadrien Ceyte; Noëlle Bru; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Time series analysis of postural responses to combined visual pitch and support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine P Agathos; Delphine Bernardin; Delphine Huchet; Anne-Catherine Scherlen; Christine Assaiante; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-06-30

4.  Differential integration of visual and kinaesthetic signals to upright stance.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Benoît Fourre; Nicolas Vuillerme; Guillaume Giraudet; Michel-Ange Amorim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Continuous visual field motion impacts the postural responses of older and younger women during and after support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Postural and spatial orientation driven by virtual reality.

Authors:  Emily A Keshner; Robert V Kenyon
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2009

Review 7.  Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review.

Authors:  Sergei V Adamovich; Gerard G Fluet; Eugene Tunik; Alma S Merians
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.138

8.  Reorientation to vertical modulated by combined support surface tilt and virtual visual flow in healthy elders and adults with stroke.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Gait adaptability training is affected by visual dependency.

Authors:  Rachel A Brady; Brian T Peters; Crystal D Batson; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Direction-dependent control of balance during walking and standing.

Authors:  Shawn M O'Connor; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.