Literature DB >> 26122710

Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.

Catherine P Agathos1, Delphine Bernardin, Delphine Huchet, Anne-Catherine Scherlen, Christine Assaiante, Brice Isableu.   

Abstract

Reliance on the visual frame of reference for spatial orientation (or visual field dependence) has been reported to increase with age. This has implications on old adults' daily living tasks as it affects stability, attention, and adaptation capacities. However, the nature and underlying mechanisms of this increase are not well defined. We investigated sensorimotor and cognitive factors possibly associated with increased visual field dependence in old age, by considering functions that are both known to degrade with age and important for spatial orientation and sensorimotor control: reliance on the (somatosensory-based) egocentric frame of reference, visual fixation stability, and attentional processing of complex visual scenes (useful field of view, UFOV). Twenty young, 18 middle-aged, and 20 old adults completed a visual examination, three tests of visual field dependence (RFT, RDT, and GEFT), a test of egocentric dependence (subjective vertical estimation with the body erect and tilted at 70°), a visual fixation task, and a test of visual attentional processing (UFOV®). Increased visual field dependence with age was associated with reduced egocentric dependence, visual fixation stability, and visual attentional processing. In addition, visual fixation instability and reduced UFOV were correlated. Results of middle-aged adults fell between those of the young and old, revealing the progressive nature of the age effects we evaluated. We discuss results in terms of reference frame selection with respect to ageing as well as visual and non-visual information processing. Inter-individual differences amongst old adults are highlighted and discussed with respect to the functionality of increased visual field dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26122710      PMCID: PMC4485658          DOI: 10.1007/s11357-015-9805-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age (Dordr)        ISSN: 0161-9152


  127 in total

1.  Effects of aging on the useful field of view.

Authors:  A B Sekuler; P J Bennett; M Mamelak
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Visual and proprioceptive shifts in perceived egocentric direction induced by eye-position.

Authors:  J Lewald; W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: from basic science to general practice.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06-03

4.  A positive correlation between fixation instability and the strength of illusory motion in a static display.

Authors:  Ikuya Murakami; Akiyoshi Kitaoka; Hiroshi Ashida
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Effects of distance and gaze position on postural stability in young and old subjects.

Authors:  Zoï Kapoula; Thanh-Thuan Lê
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Eye and neck proprioceptive messages contribute to the spatial coding of retinal input in visually oriented activities.

Authors:  R Roll; J L Velay; J P Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: examination of the useful field of view.

Authors:  C T Scialfa; D W Kline; B J Lyman
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1987-03

8.  Elderly adults delay proprioceptive reweighting during the anticipation of collision avoidance when standing.

Authors:  D J A Eikema; V Hatzitaki; V Konstantakos; C Papaxanthis
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Healthy older observers show equivalent perceptual-cognitive training benefits to young adults for multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Isabelle Legault; Rémy Allard; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-06

10.  Aging and selective sensorimotor strategies in the regulation of upright balance.

Authors:  Nicoleta Bugnariu; Joyce Fung
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  8 in total

1.  Visual dependence and spatial orientation in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Authors:  Maitreyi A Nair; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Helen S Cohen
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Young and Older Adults Differ in Integration of Sensory Cues for Vertical Perception.

Authors:  Rima Abdul Razzak; Jeff Bagust; Sharon Docherty
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2020-07-31

3.  Relationship of visual dependence to age, balance, attention, and vertigo.

Authors:  Shu-Chun Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-08-10

4.  Relationships Between Accuracy in Predicting Direction of Gravitational Vertical and Academic Performance and Physical Fitness in Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Wayne Haynes; Gordon Waddington; Roger Adams; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-23

5.  Persistent postural perceptual dizziness is on a spectrum in the general population.

Authors:  Georgina Powell; Hannah Derry-Sumner; Deepak Rajenderkumar; Simon K Rushton; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Postural Control While Walking Interferes With Spatial Learning in Older Adults Navigating in a Real Environment.

Authors:  Catherine Persephone Agathos; Stephen Ramanoël; Marcia Bécu; Delphine Bernardin; Christophe Habas; Angelo Arleo
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  Regularity of Center of Pressure Trajectories in Expert Gymnasts during Bipedal Closed-Eyes Quiet Standing.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Petra Hlavackova; Bruno Diot; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Perceiving jittering self-motion in a field of lollipops from ages 4 to 95.

Authors:  Nils-Alexander Bury; Michael R Jenkin; Robert S Allison; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.