Literature DB >> 2932530

Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance.

T A Stoffregen.   

Abstract

In four experiments I examined the importance of the retinal center and periphery in the pickup of optical information for controlling stance as a function of the dynamic geometrical structure of the optical flow. All experiments were performed in a moving room so that the magnitude of compensatory sway in response to room movements could be measured. In Experiments 1 and 2 I found stronger sway response to flow having a largely lamellar structure that was presented to the retinal periphery than to more radially structured flow in the center. In Experiment 3 observers turned their heads to face the right wall of the room, placing radial flow in the periphery and lamellar flow in the center of the visual field. Radial flow presented to the retinal periphery induced no compensatory sway. Lamellar flow in the center of the retina produced some sway. Flow structure apparently interacts with the exposed retinal area in controlling stance.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2932530     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.11.5.554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  49 in total

1.  The visual control of stability in children and adults: postural readjustments in a ground optical flow.

Authors:  Bernard Baumberger; Brice Isableu; Michelangelo Flückiger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The influence of dynamic visual cues for postural control in children aged 7-12 years.

Authors:  Patrick J Sparto; Mark S Redfern; Jeff G Jasko; Margaretha L Casselbrant; Ellen M Mandel; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion.

Authors:  W H Warren; K J Kurtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

4.  The influence of sensory information on two-component coordination during quiet stance.

Authors:  Yuanfen Zhang; Tim Kiemel; John Jeka
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Postural costs of performing cognitive tasks in non-coincident reference frames.

Authors:  E V Fraizer; Mitra Suvobrata; Subhobrata Mitra
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Age-related differences in postural control: effects of the complexity of visual manipulation and sensorimotor contribution to postural performance.

Authors:  Diana R Toledo; José A Barela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Importance of optic flow for postural stability of male and female young adults.

Authors:  Milena Raffi; Alessandro Piras; Michela Persiani; Salvatore Squatrito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Perceiving self-motion in depth: the role of stereoscopic motion and changing-size cues.

Authors:  S Palmisano
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

9.  Postural responses to simulated moving environments are not invariant for the direction of gaze.

Authors:  C C Gielen; W N van Asten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visual motion combined with base of support width reveals variable field dependency in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jefferson W Streepey; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.