Literature DB >> 35694744

The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements in Drosophila.

Dynisty Wright1, Stephen W Schaeffer1.   

Abstract

DNA within chromosomes in the nucleus is non-randomly organized into chromosome territories, compartments and topologically associated domains (TADs). Chromosomal rearrangements have the potential to alter chromatin organization and modify gene expression leading to selection against these structural variants. Drosophila pseudoobscura has a wealth of naturally occurring gene arrangements that were generated by overlapping inversion mutations caused by two chromosomal breaks that rejoin the central region in reverse order. Unlike humans, Drosophila inversion heterozygotes do not have negative effects associated with crossing over during meiosis because males use achiasmate mechanisms for proper segregation, and aberrant recombinant meiotic products generated in females are lost in polar bodies. As a result, Drosophila populations are found to harbour extensive inversion polymorphisms. It is not clear, however, whether chromatin architecture constrains which inversions breakpoints persist in populations. We mapped the breakpoints of seven inversions in D. pseudoobscura to the TAD map to determine if persisting inversion breakpoints are more likely to occur at boundaries between TADs. Our results show that breakpoints occur at TAD boundaries more than expected by chance. Some breakpoints may alter gene expression within TADs supporting the hypothesis that position effects contribute to inversion establishment. This article is part of the theme issue 'Genomic architecture of supergenes: causes and evolutionary consequences'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TADS; chromatin architecture; gene expression; genomic rearrangements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35694744      PMCID: PMC9189500          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.671


  76 in total

1.  Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of heterosis through natural selection in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  T DOBZHANSKY
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1950-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Architectural proteins, transcription, and the three-dimensional organization of the genome.

Authors:  Caelin Cubeñas-Potts; Victor G Corces
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  THE EXPECTED FIXATION RATE OF CHROMOSOMAL INVERSIONS.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Enhancer-adoption as a mechanism of human developmental disease.

Authors:  Laura A Lettice; Sarah Daniels; Elizabeth Sweeney; Shanmugasundaram Venkataraman; Paul S Devenney; Philippe Gautier; Harris Morrison; Judy Fantes; Robert E Hill; David R FitzPatrick
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Frequency changes of new inversions in populations under mutation-selection equilibria.

Authors:  M Nei; K I Kojima; H E Schaffer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution.

Authors:  Stephen Richards; Yue Liu; Brian R Bettencourt; Pavel Hradecky; Stan Letovsky; Rasmus Nielsen; Kevin Thornton; Melissa J Hubisz; Rui Chen; Richard P Meisel; Olivier Couronne; Sujun Hua; Mark A Smith; Peili Zhang; Jing Liu; Harmen J Bussemaker; Marinus F van Batenburg; Sally L Howells; Steven E Scherer; Erica Sodergren; Beverly B Matthews; Madeline A Crosby; Andrew J Schroeder; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos; Catharine M Rives; Michael L Metzker; Donna M Muzny; Graham Scott; David Steffen; David A Wheeler; Kim C Worley; Paul Havlak; K James Durbin; Amy Egan; Rachel Gill; Jennifer Hume; Margaret B Morgan; George Miner; Cerissa Hamilton; Yanmei Huang; Lenée Waldron; Daniel Verduzco; Kerstin P Clerc-Blankenburg; Inna Dubchak; Mohamed A F Noor; Wyatt Anderson; Kevin P White; Andrew G Clark; Stephen W Schaeffer; William Gelbart; George M Weinstock; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dynisty Wright; Stephen W Schaeffer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

8.  Chromosomal rearrangement inferred from comparisons of 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Arjun Bhutkar; Stephen W Schaeffer; Susan M Russo; Mu Xu; Temple F Smith; William M Gelbart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome.

Authors:  Erez Lieberman-Aiden; Nynke L van Berkum; Louise Williams; Maxim Imakaev; Tobias Ragoczy; Agnes Telling; Ido Amit; Bryan R Lajoie; Peter J Sabo; Michael O Dorschner; Richard Sandstrom; Bradley Bernstein; M A Bender; Mark Groudine; Andreas Gnirke; John Stamatoyannopoulos; Leonid A Mirny; Eric S Lander; Job Dekker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Active chromatin and transcription play a key role in chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains.

Authors:  Sergey V Ulianov; Ekaterina E Khrameeva; Alexey A Gavrilov; Ilya M Flyamer; Pavel Kos; Elena A Mikhaleva; Aleksey A Penin; Maria D Logacheva; Maxim V Imakaev; Alexander Chertovich; Mikhail S Gelfand; Yuri Y Shevelyov; Sergey V Razin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  2 in total

1.  The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dynisty Wright; Stephen W Schaeffer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Genomic architecture of supergenes: connecting form and function.

Authors:  Emma L Berdan; Thomas Flatt; Genevieve M Kozak; Katie E Lotterhos; Ben Wielstra
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.