PURPOSE: To correct eddy-current artifacts in diffusion tensor (DT) images without the need to obtain auxiliary scans for the sole purpose of correction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DT images are susceptible to distortions caused by eddy currents induced by large diffusion gradients. We propose a new postacquisition correction algorithm that does not require any auxiliary reference scans. It also avoids the problematic procedure of cross-correlating images with significantly different contrasts. A linear model is used to describe the dependence of distortion parameters (translation, scaling, and shear) on the diffusion gradients. The model is solved numerically to provide an individual correction for every diffusion-weighted (DW) image. RESULTS: The assumptions of the linear model were successfully verified in a series of experiments on a silicon oil phantom. The correction obtained for this phantom was compared with correction obtained by a previously published method. The algorithm was then shown to markedly reduce eddy-current distortions in DT images from human subjects. CONCLUSION: The proposed algorithm can accurately correct eddy-current artifacts in DT images. Its principal advantages are that only images with comparable signals and contrasts are cross-correlated, and no additional scans are required. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To correct eddy-current artifacts in diffusion tensor (DT) images without the need to obtain auxiliary scans for the sole purpose of correction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DT images are susceptible to distortions caused by eddy currents induced by large diffusion gradients. We propose a new postacquisition correction algorithm that does not require any auxiliary reference scans. It also avoids the problematic procedure of cross-correlating images with significantly different contrasts. A linear model is used to describe the dependence of distortion parameters (translation, scaling, and shear) on the diffusion gradients. The model is solved numerically to provide an individual correction for every diffusion-weighted (DW) image. RESULTS: The assumptions of the linear model were successfully verified in a series of experiments on a silicon oil phantom. The correction obtained for this phantom was compared with correction obtained by a previously published method. The algorithm was then shown to markedly reduce eddy-current distortions in DT images from human subjects. CONCLUSION: The proposed algorithm can accurately correct eddy-current artifacts in DT images. Its principal advantages are that only images with comparable signals and contrasts are cross-correlated, and no additional scans are required. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Andreia V Faria; Jiangyang Zhang; Kenichi Oishi; Xin Li; Hangyi Jiang; Kazi Akhter; Laurent Hermoye; Seung-Koo Lee; Alexander Hoon; Elaine Stashinko; Michael I Miller; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kathryn R Tringale; Tanya T Nguyen; Roshan Karunamuni; Tyler Seibert; Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Michael Connor; Vitali Moiseenko; Mary Kay Gorman; Anisa Marshall; Michelle Devereux Tibbs; Nikdokht Farid; Daniel Simpson; Parag Sanghvi; Carrie R McDonald; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nathan A Gillespie; Michael C Neale; Donald J Hagler; Lisa T Eyler; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Carol E Franz; Michael J Lyons; Linda K McEvoy; Anders M Dale; Matthew S Panizzon; William S Kremen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Sean N Hatton; Matthew S Panizzon; Eero Vuoksimaa; Donald J Hagler; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Daniel Rinker; Lisa T Eyler; Carol E Franz; Michael J Lyons; Michael C Neale; Ming T Tsuang; Anders M Dale; William S Kremen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Elise A Stave; Michael D De Bellis; Steven R Hooper; Donald P Woolley; Suk Ki Chang; Steven D Chen Journal: J Child Neurol Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: Sana Parsian; Habib Rahbar; Kimberly H Allison; Wendy B Demartini; Matthew L Olson; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 11.105