Literature DB >> 18420366

Diffusion anisotropy indexes are sensitive to selecting the EPI readout-encoding bandwidth at high-field MRI.

Geon-Ho Jahng1, Michael W Weiner, Norbert Schuff.   

Abstract

Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT-MRI) is generally performed using an echo planar imaging (EPI) acquisition to map directional water diffusion. However, the oscillating magnetic field gradients of the EPI acquisition can result in considerable mechanical vibrations, which lead, in turn, to magnetic field fluctuations causing Nyquist ghosting in the EPI data. The objective of this study was to investigate effects of EPI readout gradient modulation frequency, which is directly associated with the EPI readout bandwidth (BW), on the accuracy of DT-MRI measurements in a high magnetic field system. A spherical water phantom was used to study the relationship between the EPI BW and the Nyquist ghost for a spin-echo EPI acquisition with a matrix size of 128x128, complemented by diffusion sensitization gradients of up to b=800 s/mm(2) along six directions for DT-MRI. Nine volunteers (four males and five females) were studied using EPI at different BW acquisitions. Analysis of variance was used to investigate the EPI BW effects. The phantom studies demonstrated a systematic relationship between BWs and the intensities of Nyquist ghosts. In the human brain studies, EPI BW variations substantially corrupted diffusion anisotropy indexes (i.e., fractional anisotropy and relative anisotropy) (F=10.5, P=.0001) but were unrelated to diffusion-encoding directions (F=0.14, P=.98). It was possible to minimize BW dependence (F=1.48, P=.25) by tuning the modulation frequency of the EPI readout gradient. In conclusion, diffusion anisotropic indexes are sensitive to the readout BW of EPI due to associated Nyquist ghosting. However, the effect can be minimized by tuning the modulation frequency of the EPI readout gradient, that is, the EPI BW, to a range outside the harmonics of mechanical gradient vibrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18420366      PMCID: PMC2556209          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  22 in total

1.  Mapping eddy current induced fields for the correction of diffusion-weighted echo planar images.

Authors:  M A Horsfield
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.

Authors:  D L Price; J P De Wilde; A M Papadaki; J S Curran; R I Kitney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  k-space correction of eddy-current-induced distortions in diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  Nikos G Papadakis; Theo Smponias; Jason Berwick; John E W Mayhew
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  MRI receiver frequency response as a contributor to Nyquist ghosting in echo planar imaging.

Authors:  Ioannis Delakis; Krystallia Petala; Janet P De Wilde
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Denis Le Bihan; Cyril Poupon; Alexis Amadon; Franck Lethimonnier
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking.

Authors:  Hangyi Jiang; Peter C M van Zijl; Jinsuh Kim; Godfrey D Pearlson; Susumu Mori
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Echoplanar diffusion tensor imaging of the lower leg musculature using eddy current nulled stimulated echo preparation.

Authors:  G Steidle; F Schick
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Acoustic noise reduction in a 4 T MRI scanner.

Authors:  Chris K Mechefske; Ryan Geris; Joseph S Gati; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging.

Authors:  P Jezzard; A S Barnett; C Pierpaoli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Concomitant magnetic-field-induced artifacts in axial echo planar imaging.

Authors:  X J Zhou; Y P Du; M A Bernstein; H G Reynolds; J K Maier; J A Polzin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  5 in total

1.  Optimising diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: comparison of image quality between monopolar and bipolar single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequences.

Authors:  Stavroula Kyriazi; Matthew Blackledge; David J Collins; Nandita M Desouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Influence of selecting EPI readout-encoding bandwidths on arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Geon-Ho Jahng; Norbert Schuff
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Radiofrequency artefacts in echoplanar imaging induced by two 1.5 T MR scanners in close proximity.

Authors:  X Li; J Cui; S P Christopasak; A Kumar; Z-G Peng
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Characterization of Nyquist ghost in EPI-fMRI acquisition sequences implemented on two clinical 1.5 T MR scanner systems: effect of readout bandwidth and echo spacing.

Authors:  Marco Giannelli; Stefano Diciotti; Carlo Tessa; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Comparison of Diffusion MRI Acquisition Protocols for the In Vivo Characterization of the Mouse Spinal Cord: Variability Analysis and Application to an Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Model.

Authors:  Matteo Figini; Alessandro Scotti; Stefania Marcuzzo; Silvia Bonanno; Francesco Padelli; Victoria Moreno-Manzano; José Manuel García-Verdugo; Pia Bernasconi; Renato Mantegazza; Maria Grazia Bruzzone; Ileana Zucca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.