Literature DB >> 17024506

Evaluation of a single-locus real-time polymerase chain reaction as a screening test for specific detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in ICU patients.

K Oberdorfer1, S Pohl, M Frey, K Heeg, C Wendt.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the diagnostic value of a single-locus real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) recently proposed for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from clinical samples (IDI-MRSA; Infectio Diagnostic, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada). This test, which was developed on the basis of studies of the sequence analysis of the mecA gene carried by staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), was used to screen nasal swabs of 320 intensive care unit (ICU) patients at admission. The results were compared with those of conventional culture of swabs from several body sites. When compared with culture of swabs from the nose, throat, and wounds, the diagnostic values of the real-time PCR test from nasal swabs were as follows: 92.3% sensitivity, 98.6% specificity, 75.0% positive predictive value, and 99.6% negative predictive value. Fifteen (4.7%) samples could not be evaluated because the PCR reaction was inhibited, even after the samples were frozen and thawed for retesting. Culture of nasal swabs showed that 78 of the patients were colonized with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. Unexpectedly, 4 (5.1%) of these samples gave false-positive results in the IDI-MRSA. These isolates were all single clones, as shown by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and spa typing. Reliable results were obtained with the IDI-MRSA assay, even in a patient population with a low prevalence (approximately 4%) of MRSA and even when compared with swabs of different body sites. Nevertheless, further work is needed to reduce the inhibition rate of the PCR and to explain why false-positive results were obtained with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17024506     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-006-0203-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   5.103


  23 in total

1.  Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) after discharge from hospital: follow-up for how long? A Dutch multi-centre study.

Authors:  H E Blok; M R Vriens; A J Weersink; A Troelstra
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management.

Authors:  Dag Harmsen; Heike Claus; Wolfgang Witte; Jörg Rothgänger; Hermann Claus; Doris Turnwald; Ulrich Vogel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  David K Warren; Robert S Liao; Liana R Merz; Michael Eveland; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Selective screening of carriers for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in high-risk hospital areas with a high level of endemic MRSA.

Authors:  E Girou; G Pujade; P Legrand; F Cizeau; C Brun-Buisson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Revised guidelines for the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in hospitals. British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Hospital Infection Society and the Infection Control Nurses Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T Ito; Y Katayama; K Asada; N Mori; K Tsutsumimoto; C Tiensasitorn; K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Efficient detection and long-term persistence of the carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M D Sanford; A F Widmer; M J Bale; R N Jones; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  B Shopsin; M Gomez; S O Montgomery; D H Smith; M Waddington; D E Dodge; D A Bost; M Riehman; S Naidich; B N Kreiswirth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid screening and identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical samples by selective-broth and real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  Hong Fang; Göran Hedin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from sterile or nonsterile clinical samples by a new molecular assay.

Authors:  Patrice Francois; Didier Pittet; Manuela Bento; Béatrice Pepey; Pierre Vaudaux; Daniel Lew; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  25 in total

1.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of two versions of the IDI-MRSA assay using charcoal swabs for prospective nasal and nonnasal surveillance samples.

Authors:  Sean X Zhang; Steven J Drews; Joanne Tomassi; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use.

Authors:  Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Bridget Kufner; Karine Truchon; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul; Ari Robicsek; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of three molecular assays for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Patrice Francois; Manuela Bento; Gesuele Renzi; Stephan Harbarth; Didier Pittet; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A common variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVa in isolates from Copenhagen, Denmark, is not detected by the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus assay.

Authors:  Mette Damkjaer Bartels; Kit Boye; Susanne Mie Rohde; Anders Rhod Larsen; Herbert Torfs; Peggy Bouchy; Robert Skov; Henrik Westh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.

Authors:  A Tübbicke; C Hübner; A Kramer; N-O Hübner; S Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in diverse clinical specimens by the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay and comparison with culture.

Authors:  Katja Lucke; Michael Hombach; Melanie Hug; Gaby E Pfyffer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Clinical application of real-time PCR to screening critically ill and emergency-care surgical patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a quantitative analytical study.

Authors:  M Trent Herdman; Duncan Wyncoll; Eugene Halligan; Penelope R Cliff; Gary French; Jonathan D Edgeworth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm MRSA achromopeptidase assay for real-time PCR detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nasal specimens.

Authors:  Parul A Patel; Nathan A Ledeboer; Christine C Ginocchio; Susan Condon; Stephanie Bouchard; Peibing Qin; Tobi Karchmer; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current status.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.