Literature DB >> 12843018

Rapid screening and identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical samples by selective-broth and real-time PCR assay.

Hong Fang1, Göran Hedin.   

Abstract

A screening method for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by using selective broth and real-time PCR (broth-PCR) was developed and evaluated. The samples (n = 304) were cultured in the broth overnight, followed by nuc gene detection by real-time PCR. nuc-negative samples were further checked for the presence of nuc amplification inhibitors by a PCR internal inhibitor assay. nuc-positive samples and nuc-negative samples with PCR inhibitors were cultured onto plates and processed further. The diagnostic values for this MRSA screening method were 93.3% sensitivity, 89.6% specificity, 31.8% positive predictive value, and 99.6% negative predictive value. The application of the broth-PCR method will be able to report most of the negative samples (258 of 289 [89.3%]) on the next morning and can save as much as 84.9% (258 of 304) of the labor and cost spent on processing the nuc-negative specimens on plates. In the study, all the samples were processed in parallel by the broth enrichment method and the plating method for comparison. To identify MRSA, the isolated oxacillin-resistant S. aureus strains were tested by a duplex real-time PCR targeting the mecA gene and the nuc gene. A collection of MRSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus epidermidis strains and a panel of standard strains of 11 bacterial species other than S. aureus were also tested by this method, which was proved to be a valuable tool for MRSA identification in a routine microbiological laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12843018      PMCID: PMC165274          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.2894-2899.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  20 in total

1.  Survey of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in the hospitals of central Greece.

Authors:  E Petinaki; F Kontos; V Miriagou; M Maniati; F Hatzi; A N Maniatis
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 2.  Secrets of success of a human pathogen: molecular evolution of pandemic clones of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Duarte C Oliveira; Alexander Tomasz; Hermínia de Lencastre
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and simultaneous species confirmation using real-time fluorescence PCR.

Authors:  U Reischl; H J Linde; M Metz; B Leppmeier; N Lehn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Mark C Enright; D Ashley Robinson; Gaynor Randle; Edward J Feil; Hajo Grundmann; Brian G Spratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood cultures by real-time fluorescence PCR.

Authors:  T Y Tan; S Corden; R Barnes; B Cookson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Epidemiology and susceptibility of 3,051 Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 25 university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY study.

Authors:  A C Fluit; C L Wielders; J Verhoef; F J Schmitz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Control of endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a cost-benefit analysis in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  C Chaix; I Durand-Zaleski; C Alberti; C Brun-Buisson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Methods for identifying methicillin resistancein Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R W Smyth; G Kahlmeter; B Olsson Liljequist; B Hoffman
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Cost-effectiveness of active surveillance cultures and contact/droplet precautions for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T B Karchmer; L J Durbin; B M Simonton; B M Farr
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and simultaneous confirmation by automated nucleic acid extraction and real-time PCR.

Authors:  Andrea J Grisold; Eva Leitner; Gerhard Mühlbauer; Egon Marth; Harald H Kessler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  40 in total

1.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  David K Warren; Robert S Liao; Liana R Merz; Michael Eveland; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from screening enrichment broths by real-time PCR.

Authors:  K Levi; K J Towner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing.

Authors:  M J Espy; J R Uhl; L M Sloan; S P Buckwalter; M F Jones; E A Vetter; J D C Yao; N L Wengenack; J E Rosenblatt; F R Cockerill; T F Smith
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Verification of the IDI-MRSA assay for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse specimen types in a core clinical laboratory setting.

Authors:  Steven J Drews; Barbara M Willey; Nathan Kreiswirth; Min Wang; Teresa Ianes; Jayne Mitchell; Mary Latchford; Allison J McGeer; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  MVPlex assay for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in naris and other swab specimens.

Authors:  Raymond P Podzorski; Haijing Li; Jian Han; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.

Authors:  A Tübbicke; C Hübner; A Kramer; N-O Hübner; S Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Evaluation of the LightCycler methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) advanced test for detection of MRSA nasal colonization.

Authors:  W C Yam; Gilman K H Siu; P L Ho; T K Ng; T L Que; K T Yip; Cathie P K Fok; Jonathan H K Chen; Vincent C C Cheng; K Y Yuen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Use of a three-dimensional microarray system for detection of levofloxacin resistance and the mec A gene in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Tomonori Nagaoka; Toshinobu Horii; Takatomo Satoh; Tomoko Ito; Akio Monji; Akihiro Takeshita; Masato Maekawa
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current status.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.074

10.  Validation of virulence and epidemiology DNA microarray for identification and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  Richard P Spence; Victoria Wright; Dlawer A A Ala-Aldeen; David P Turner; Karl G Wooldridge; Richard James
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.