Literature DB >> 17522279

Comparison of two versions of the IDI-MRSA assay using charcoal swabs for prospective nasal and nonnasal surveillance samples.

Sean X Zhang1, Steven J Drews, Joanne Tomassi, Kevin C Katz.   

Abstract

An updated IDI-MRSA assay version was released to address the assay's low positive predictive value (PPV). A prospective analysis of two assay versions indicated no significant improvement in the PPV. Colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 24% of patients would not have been detected if only nasal samples had been tested, as approved, by this molecular method.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17522279      PMCID： PMC1932969          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.00469-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

Review 1.  SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus.

Authors:  Carlene A Muto; John A Jernigan; Belinda E Ostrowsky; Hervé M Richet; William R Jarvis; John M Boyce; Barry M Farr
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  David K Warren; Robert S Liao; Liana R Merz; Michael Eveland; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Concurrent analysis of nose and groin swab specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR assay is comparable to analysis by individual-specimen PCR and routine culture assays for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Emma J Bishop; Elizabeth A Grabsch; Susan A Ballard; Barrie Mayall; Shirley Xie; Rhea Martin; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Verification of the IDI-MRSA assay for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse specimen types in a core clinical laboratory setting.

Authors:  Steven J Drews; Barbara M Willey; Nathan Kreiswirth; Min Wang; Teresa Ianes; Jayne Mitchell; Mary Latchford; Allison J McGeer; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium, MRSA select, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lisa Louie; Deirdre Soares; Helen Meaney; Mary Vearncombe; Andrew E Simor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of MRSA Select, a new chromogenic medium for the detection of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Sana Ben Nsira; Michel Dupuis; Roland Leclercq
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.283

7.  Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus from nasal and rectal specimens pooled in a selective broth.

Authors:  M Desjardins; Christiane Guibord; B Lalonde; B Toye; K Ramotar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  The economic impact of Staphylococcus aureus infection in New York City hospitals.

Authors:  R J Rubin; C A Harrington; A Poon; K Dietrich; J A Greene; A Moiduddin
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Huletsky; R Giroux; V Rossbach; M Gagnon; M Vaillancourt; M Bernier; F Gagnon; K Truchon; M Bastien; F J Picard; A van Belkum; M Ouellette; P H Roy; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Cost-effectiveness of active surveillance cultures and contact/droplet precautions for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T B Karchmer; L J Durbin; B M Simonton; B M Farr
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.926
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Sensitivities of nasal and rectal swabs for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in an active surveillance program.

Authors:  Andrea Currie; Linda Davis; Ewa Odrobina; Suzanne Waldman; Diane White; Joanne Tomassi; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A common variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVa in isolates from Copenhagen, Denmark, is not detected by the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus assay.

Authors:  Mette Damkjaer Bartels; Kit Boye; Susanne Mie Rohde; Anders Rhod Larsen; Herbert Torfs; Peggy Bouchy; Robert Skov; Henrik Westh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical application of real-time PCR to screening critically ill and emergency-care surgical patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a quantitative analytical study.

Authors:  M Trent Herdman; Duncan Wyncoll; Eugene Halligan; Penelope R Cliff; Gary French; Jonathan D Edgeworth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in specimens from various body sites: performance characteristics of the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay, the Xpert MRSA assay, and broth-enriched culture in an area with a low prevalence of MRSA infections.

Authors:  Michael Hombach; Gaby E Pfyffer; Malgorzata Roos; Katja Lucke
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current status.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Comparison of the Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay, BD GeneOhm MRSA assay, and culture for detection of nasal and cutaneous groin colonization by MRSA.

Authors:  P G Kelley; E A Grabsch; B P Howden; W Gao; M L Grayson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Lack of a major role of Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin in lower respiratory tract infection in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Randall J Olsen; Scott D Kobayashi; Ara A Ayeras; Madiha Ashraf; Shawna F Graves; Willie Ragasa; Tammy Humbird; Jamieson L Greaver; Constance Cantu; Jody L Swain; Leslie Jenkins; Terry Blasdel; Philip T Cagle; Donald J Gardner; Frank R DeLeo; James M Musser
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 9.  Intestinal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: how does its frequency compare with that of nasal carriage and what is its clinical impact?

Authors:  D S Acton; M J Tempelmans Plat-Sinnige; W van Wamel; N de Groot; A van Belkum
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Performance of BD Max StaphSR for Screening of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates among a Contemporary and Diverse Collection from 146 Institutions Located in Nine U.S. Census Regions: Prevalence of mecA Dropout Mutants.

Authors:  Rodrigo E Mendes; Amy A Watters; Paul R Rhomberg; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.948
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.