Literature DB >> 17015630

Efficacy of high doses of levofloxacin in experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

O Murillo1, A Doménech, A Garcia, F Tubau, C Cabellos, F Gudiol, J Ariza.   

Abstract

Antimicrobial efficacy in orthopedic device infections is diminished because of bacterial biofilms which express tolerance to antibiotics. Recently, the use of high doses of levofloxacin with rifampin has been recommended for staphylococcal infections. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of levofloxacin at doses of 50 mg/kg/day and 100 mg/kg/day (mimicking the usual and high human doses of 500 mg/day and 750 to 1,000 mg/day, respectively) and compared it to that of to linezolid, cloxacillin, vancomycin, and rifampin in a rat tissue cage model of experimental foreign-body infection by Staphylococcus aureus. The antimicrobial efficacy in vitro (by MIC, minimum bactericidal concentration, and kill curves) for logarithmic- and stationary-phase bacteria was compared with the in vivo efficacy. In vitro bactericidal activity at clinically relevant concentrations was reached by all drugs except rifampin and linezolid in the log-phase studies but only by levofloxacin in the stationary-phase studies. The bacterial count decreases from in vivo tissue cage fluids (means) for levofloxacin at 50 and 100 mg/kg/day, rifampin, cloxacillin, vancomycin, linezolid, and controls, respectively, were: -1.24, -2.26, -2.1, -1.56, -1.47, -1.15, and 0.33 (all groups versus controls, P < 0.05). Levofloxacin at 100 mg/kg/day (area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio, 234) was the most active therapy (P = 0.03 versus linezolid). Overall, in vivo efficacy was better predicted by stationary-phase studies, in which it reached a high correlation coefficient even if the rifampin group was excluded (r = 0.96; P < 0.05). Our results, including in vitro studies with nongrowing bacteria, pharmacodynamic parameters, and antimicrobial efficacy in experimental infection, provide good evidence to support the use of levofloxacin at high doses (750 to 1,000 mg/day), as recently recommended for treating patients with orthopedic prosthesis infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17015630      PMCID: PMC1693998          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00523-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  44 in total

Review 1.  What have we learned from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic theories?

Authors:  J J Schentag; K K Gilliland; J A Paladino
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Does the dose matter?

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms.

Authors:  P S Stewart; J W Costerton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Use of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, in the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacterial infections.

Authors:  J W Chien; M L Kucia; R A Salata
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple 750-milligram doses of intravenous levofloxacin in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A T Chow; C Fowler; R R Williams; N Morgan; S Kaminski; J Natarajan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In vivo pharmacodynamics of a new oxazolidinone (linezolid).

Authors:  D Andes; M L van Ogtrop; J Peng; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparison of levofloxacin, alatrofloxacin, and vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign-body-associated infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Patrice Francois; Carmelo Bisognano; Jacques Schrenzel; Daniel P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of linezolid in healthy volunteers and patients with Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  AUC/MIC relationships to different endpoints of the antimicrobial effect: multiple-dose in vitro simulations with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin.

Authors:  Alexander A Firsov; Stephen H Zinner; Sergey N Vostrov; Yury A Portnoy; Irene Yu Lubenko
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  22 in total

1.  Efficacy of usual and high doses of daptomycin in combination with rifampin versus alternative therapies in experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Garrigós; O Murillo; G Euba; R Verdaguer; F Tubau; C Cabellos; J Cabo; J Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Efficacy and safety of rifampin containing regimen for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention.

Authors:  O C El Helou; E F Berbari; B D Lahr; J E Eckel-Passow; R R Razonable; I G Sia; A Virk; R C Walker; J M Steckelberg; W R Wilson; A D Hanssen; D R Osmon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Antagonistic effect of rifampin on the efficacy of high-dose levofloxacin in staphylococcal experimental foreign-body infection.

Authors:  O Murillo; M E Pachón; G Euba; R Verdaguer; F Tubau; C Cabellos; J Cabo; F Gudiol; J Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The anti-biofilm effect of macrolides in a rat model of S. aureus foreign-body infection: Might it be of clinical relevance?

Authors:  Cristina El Haj; Oscar Murillo; Alba Ribera; Dolors Garcia-Somoza; Fe Tubau; Carmen Cabellos; Javier Cabo; Javier Ariza
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Comparative efficacies of cloxacillin-daptomycin and the standard cloxacillin-rifampin therapies against an experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Cristina El Haj; Oscar Murillo; Alba Ribera; Mireia Vivas; Dolors Garcia-Somoza; Fe Tubau; Javier Cabo; Javier Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Activity of Different Antistaphylococcal Therapies, Alone or Combined, in a Rat Model of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis Osteitis without Implant.

Authors:  S Albac; D Labrousse; D Hayez; N Anzala; D Bonnot; P Chavanet; E Aslangul; D Croisier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Linezolid alone or combined with rifampin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in experimental foreign-body infection.

Authors:  Daniela Baldoni; Manuel Haschke; Zarko Rajacic; Werner Zimmerli; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Intracellular activity of antibiotics in a model of human THP-1 macrophages infected by a Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variant strain isolated from a cystic fibrosis patient: study of antibiotic combinations.

Authors:  Hoang Anh Nguyen; Olivier Denis; Anne Vergison; Paul M Tulkens; Marc J Struelens; Françoise Van Bambeke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Bactericidal activity of the combination of levofloxacin with rifampin in experimental prosthetic knee infection in rabbits due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Claudette Muller-Serieys; Azzam Saleh Mghir; Laurent Massias; Bruno Fantin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Rationale for one stage exchange of infected hip replacement using uncemented implants and antibiotic impregnated bone graft.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.