Literature DB >> 19075065

Linezolid alone or combined with rifampin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in experimental foreign-body infection.

Daniela Baldoni1, Manuel Haschke, Zarko Rajacic, Werner Zimmerli, Andrej Trampuz.   

Abstract

We investigated the activity of linezolid, alone and in combination with rifampin (rifampicin), against a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain in vitro and in a guinea pig model of foreign-body infection. The MIC, minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) in logarithmic phase, and MBC in stationary growth phase were 2.5, >20, and >20 microg/ml, respectively, for linezolid; 0.01, 0.08, and 2.5 microg/ml, respectively, for rifampin; and 0.16, 0.63, >20 microg/ml, respectively, for levofloxacin. In time-kill studies, bacterial regrowth and the development of rifampin resistance were observed after 24 h with rifampin alone at 1x or 4x the MIC and were prevented by the addition of linezolid. After the administration of single intraperitoneal doses of 25, 50, and 75 mg/kg of body weight, linezolid peak concentrations of 6.8, 12.7, and 18.1 microg/ml, respectively, were achieved in sterile cage fluid at approximately 3 h. The linezolid concentration remained above the MIC of the test organism for 12 h with all doses. Antimicrobial treatments of animals with cage implant infections were given twice daily for 4 days. Linezolid alone at 25, 50, and 75 mg/kg reduced the planktonic bacteria in cage fluid during treatment by 1.2 to 1.7 log(10) CFU/ml; only linezolid at 75 mg/kg prevented bacterial regrowth 5 days after the end of treatment. Linezolid used in combination with rifampin (12.5 mg/kg) was more effective than linezolid used as monotherapy, reducing the planktonic bacteria by >or=3 log(10) CFU (P < 0.05). Efficacy in the eradication of cage-associated infection was achieved only when linezolid was combined with rifampin, with cure rates being between 50% and 60%, whereas the levofloxacin-rifampin combination demonstrated the highest cure rate (91%) against the strain tested. The linezolid-rifampin combination is a treatment option for implant-associated infections caused by quinolone-resistant MRSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19075065      PMCID: PMC2650529          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00775-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  40 in total

1.  In vitro activities of linezolid combined with other antimicrobial agents against Staphylococci, Enterococci, Pneumococci, and selected gram-negative organisms.

Authors:  Michael T Sweeney; Gary E Zurenko
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Treatment of acute post-surgical infection of joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Soriano; S García; G Bori; M Almela; X Gallart; F Macule; J Sierra; J A Martínez; S Suso; J Mensa
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  In vivo verification of in vitro model of antibiotic treatment of device-related infection.

Authors:  J Blaser; P Vergères; A F Widmer; W Zimmerli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Linezolid treatment of prosthetic hip Infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  M Bassetti; A Di Biagio; G Cenderello; V Del Bono; A Palermo; M Cruciani; D Bassetti
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.072

5.  In vitro activities of the oxazolidinone antibiotics U-100592 and U-100766 against Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; M L McElmeel; C W Trippy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pathogenesis of foreign body infection. Evidence for a local granulocyte defect.

Authors:  W Zimmerli; P D Lew; F A Waldvogel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Microbiological tests to predict treatment outcome in experimental device-related infections due to Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  W Zimmerli; R Frei; A F Widmer; Z Rajacic
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  In vitro bactericidal activities of linezolid in combination with vancomycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, fusidic acid, and rifampin against Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Patrick Grohs; Marie-Dominique Kitzis; Laurent Gutmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Efficacy and tolerability of prolonged linezolid therapy in the treatment of orthopedic implant infections.

Authors:  A Soriano; J Gómez; L Gómez; J R Azanza; R Pérez; F Romero; M Pons; F Bella; M Velasco; J Mensa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Update on the appropriate use of linezolid in clinical practice.

Authors:  Roberto Manfredi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  38 in total

1.  Treatment with linezolid or vancomycin in combination with rifampin is effective in an animal model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus foreign body osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Paschalis Vergidis; Mark S Rouse; Gorane Euba; Melissa J Karau; Suzannah M Schmidt; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Rifamycins, Alone and in Combination.

Authors:  David M Rothstein
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 3.  Pathogenesis of implant-associated infection: the role of the host.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Parham Sendi
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 4.  Propionibacterium acnes: from commensal to opportunistic biofilm-associated implant pathogen.

Authors:  Yvonne Achermann; Ellie J C Goldstein; Tom Coenye; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Emergence of antibiotic-resistant extremophiles (AREs).

Authors:  Prashant Gabani; Dhan Prakash; Om V Singh
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis Has No Effect on Time to Positivity and Proportion of Positive Samples: a Cohort Study of 64 Cutibacterium acnes Bone and Joint Infections.

Authors:  Alexia Anagnostopoulos; Daniel A Bossard; Bruno Ledergerber; Patrick O Zingg; Annelies S Zinkernagel; Christian Gerber; Yvonne Achermann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease.

Authors:  Nathan K Archer; Mark J Mazaitis; J William Costerton; Jeff G Leid; Mary Elizabeth Powers; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.882

8.  High activity of Fosfomycin and Rifampin against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vitro and in an experimental foreign-body infection model.

Authors:  Raluca Mihailescu; Ulrika Furustrand Tafin; Stéphane Corvec; Alessandra Oliva; Bertrand Betrisey; Oliver Borens; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm Infections In Vitro, in Animal Models, and in Orthopedic-Device-Related Infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Parham Sendi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Anti-biofilm activity and synergism of novel thiazole compounds with glycopeptide antibiotics against multidrug-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  Haroon Mohammad; Abdelrahman S Mayhoub; Mark Cushman; Mohamed N Seleem
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.