Literature DB >> 12384354

In vivo pharmacodynamics of a new oxazolidinone (linezolid).

D Andes1, M L van Ogtrop, J Peng, W A Craig.   

Abstract

Linezolid is a new oxazolidinone with activity against gram-positive cocci. We determined the in vivo activity of linezolid against four strains of Staphylococcus aureus (two methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] strains and two methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains) and one penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae (PSSP) strain, two penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae strains, and five penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains. The mice had 10(6.3) to 10(7.7) CFU/thigh before therapy and were then treated for 24 h with 5 to 1,280 mg of linezolid/kg divided into 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 doses. The killing activities after 4 h of therapy ranged from 2.4 to 5.0 log(10) CFU/thigh against S. pneumoniae and 1.35 to 2.2 log(10) CFU/thigh against S. aureus. Increasing doses produced minimal concentration-dependent killing; doses of 20 and 80 mg/kg produced no in vivo postantibiotic effects (PAEs) with PSSP and modest PAEs (3.4 and 3.2 h) with MSSA. Pharmacokinetic studies at doses of 20 and 80 mg/kg by high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis exhibited peak dose values of 0.68 and 0.71 and elimination half-lives of 1.02 and 1.00 h. Linezolid MICs ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 micro g/ml for S. pneumoniae and from 1.0 to 4.0 micro g/ml for S. aureus. A sigmoid dose-response model was used to estimate the dose required to achieve a net bacteriostatic effect over 24 h. Static doses against S. pneumoniae ranged from 22.2 to 97.1 mg/kg/24 h and from 133 to 167 mg/kg/24 h for S. aureus. The 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio was the major parameter determining the efficacy of linezolid against PSSP (R(2) = 82% for AUC/MIC versus 57% for T>MIC and 59% for the peak level in serum/MIC [peak/MIC]). It was difficult to determine the most relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameter with S. aureus, although the outcomes correlated slightly better with the 24-h AUC/MIC ratio (R(2) = 75%) than with the other parameters (T>MIC R(2) = 75% and peak/MIC R(2) = 65%). The 24-h AUC/MIC ratio required for a bacteriostatic effect with linezolid varied from 22 to 97 (mean = 48) for pneumococci and from 39 to 167 (mean = 83) for staphylococci. Based upon a pharmacokinetic goal of a 24-h AUC/MIC of 50 to 100, a dosage regimen of 600 mg given either intravenously or orally twice daily would achieve success against organisms with MICs as high as 2 to 4 micro g/ml.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12384354      PMCID: PMC128755          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.11.3484-3489.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  17 in total

Review 1.  Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections.

Authors:  B E Murray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of linezolid following multiple oral doses.

Authors:  T Gee; R Ellis; G Marshall; J Andrews; J Ashby; R Wise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Determination of linezolid in plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  G W Peng; R P Stryd; S Murata; M Igarashi; K Chiba; H Aoyama; M Aoyama; T Zenki; N Ozawa
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.935

4.  Correlation of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters with therapeutic efficacy in an animal model.

Authors:  B Vogelman; S Gudmundsson; J Leggett; J Turnidge; S Ebert; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Activities of the oxazolidinones linezolid and eperezolid in experimental intra-abdominal abscess due to Enterococcus faecalis or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  T Schülin; C Thauvin-Eliopoulos; R C Moellering; G M Eliopoulos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro activities of linezolid against important gram-positive bacterial pathogens including vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  G A Noskin; F Siddiqui; V Stosor; D Hacek; L R Peterson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Epidemiology of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R L Thompson; I Cabezudo; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Relevance of animal models for clinical treatment.

Authors:  W Craig
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Comparative antibiotic dose-effect relations at several dosing intervals in murine pneumonitis and thigh-infection models.

Authors:  J E Leggett; B Fantin; S Ebert; K Totsuka; B Vogelman; W Calame; H Mattie; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Pharmacodynamics of amikacin in vitro and in mouse thigh and lung infections.

Authors:  W A Craig; J Redington; S C Ebert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  91 in total

1.  In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of tomopenem (formerly CS-023) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a murine thigh infection model.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Sugihara; Chika Sugihara; Yoko Matsushita; Naotoshi Yamamura; Mitsutoshi Uemori; Akane Tokumitsu; Harumi Inoue; Masayo Kakuta; Eiko Namba; Hatsumi Nasu; Tetsufumi Koga
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral linezolid in adults with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Rebecca A Keel; Andre Schaeftlein; Charlotte Kloft; J Samuel Pope; R Frederic Knauft; Marianne Muhlebach; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of daptomycin, tigecycline, and linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infections in four western European countries.

Authors:  A Canut; A Isla; C Betriu; A R Gascón
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Pharmacokinetics and pulmonary disposition of tedizolid and linezolid in a murine pneumonia model under variable conditions.

Authors:  Rebecca A Keel; Jared L Crandon; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Activity of oxacillin versus that of vancomycin against oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates evaluated by population analyses, time-kill assays, and a murine thigh infection model.

Authors:  Maria Labrou; George Michail; Eleni Ntokou; Theodore E Pittaras; Spyros Pournaras; Athanassios Tsakris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Linezolid alone or combined with rifampin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in experimental foreign-body infection.

Authors:  Daniela Baldoni; Manuel Haschke; Zarko Rajacic; Werner Zimmerli; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of gatifloxacin in a lethal murine Bacillus anthracis inhalation infection model.

Authors:  Paul G Ambrose; Alan Forrest; William A Craig; Chistopher M Rubino; Sujata M Bhavnani; George L Drusano; Henry S Heine
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae infections: current and future therapeutic options.

Authors:  Françoise Van Bambeke; René R Reinert; Peter C Appelbaum; Paul M Tulkens; Willy E Peetermans
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous linezolid in moderately to morbidly obese adults.

Authors:  Amira A Bhalodi; Pavlos K Papasavas; Darren S Tishler; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Use of an in vitro pharmacodynamic model to derive a linezolid regimen that optimizes bacterial kill and prevents emergence of resistance in Bacillus anthracis.

Authors:  A Louie; H S Heine; K Kim; D L Brown; B VanScoy; W Liu; M Kinzig-Schippers; F Sörgel; G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.