Literature DB >> 12356798

AUC/MIC relationships to different endpoints of the antimicrobial effect: multiple-dose in vitro simulations with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin.

Alexander A Firsov1, Stephen H Zinner, Sergey N Vostrov, Yury A Portnoy, Irene Yu Lubenko.   

Abstract

Most integral endpoints of antimicrobial effect, including area between the control growth and time-kill curves (ABBC), area above the curve (AAC) and area under the time-kill curve (AUBC) are determined over a dosing interval (tau), regardless of the actual effect duration. Unlike these tau-related endpoints, the intensity of antimicrobial effect (I(E)) considers the area between the control growth and time-kill curves from time zero to the time when bacterial counts on the regrowth curve achieve the same maximal numbers as in the absence of antibiotic, even if this time is greater than tau. Recently, important differences between ABBC-, AAC-, AUBC- and I(E)-AUC/MIC relationships were reported in single-dose simulations. The present study was designed to examine these relationships in multiple-dose simulations. A clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus was exposed to simulated pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin (MIC = 0.37 mg/L) and levofloxacin (MIC = 0.6 mg/L), simulating three consecutive 24 h doses, which varied over a 32-fold range in the 24 h AUC/MIC ratio (AUC(tau)/MIC: 14-444 h and 15-484 h, respectively). The cumulative effect of each treatment was expressed by I(E), determined from time zero to the time after the third dose when the effect could no longer be detected, and by ABBC, AAC and AUBC calculated over a 72 h period (i.e. over three dosing intervals). With all four endpoints, systematic AUCtau/MIC increase-induced changes in effect-an increase in I(E), ABBC and AAC, or a decrease in AUBC-were observed and the log AUC(tau)/MIC-response curves were fitted by an E(max) model. Using I(E), the effects of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin could be distinguished over a wider range of AUC(tau)/MIC ratios than with ABBC and AUBC, whereas no differences between the fluoroquinolones could be seen based on the AAC-AUC(tau)/MIC curves. Although ABBC and AUBC were more descriptive than AAC, these two endpoints distinguished the fluoroquinolone effects only over a relatively narrow AUC(tau)/MIC range ( approximately 40-100 h), which includes therapeutically achievable values for levofloxacin but not for moxifloxacin. Similar limitations of the tau-related endpoints might be critical in comparative studies with other new fluoroquinolones where therapeutic AUCtau/MIC ratios are >100 h.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12356798     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkf177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of in vitro activity of marbofloxacin against Escherichia coli strains.

Authors:  M Andraud; C Chauvin; P Sanders; M Laurentie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Efficacy of high doses of levofloxacin in experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  O Murillo; A Doménech; A Garcia; F Tubau; C Cabellos; F Gudiol; J Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of the mutant selection window hypothesis using four fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Alexander A Firsov; Sergey N Vostrov; Irene Y Lubenko; Karl Drlica; Yury A Portnoy; Stephen H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Moxifloxacin dosing in post-bariatric surgery patients.

Authors:  Pieter Colin; Douglas J Eleveld; Michel M R F Struys; Huybrecht T'Jollyn; Luc M Van Bortel; Johannes Ruige; Jan De Waele; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Koen Boussery
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Pharmacodynamic assessment based on mutant prevention concentrations of fluoroquinolones to prevent the emergence of resistant mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Homma; Toshihiko Hori; Giichi Sugimori; Yoshinori Yamano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin in the context of other contemporary fluoroquinolones: a review.

Authors:  Peter Ball
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2003-11

Review 7.  Quinolone antibiotics.

Authors:  Thu D M Pham; Zyta M Ziora; Mark A T Blaskovich
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.597

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.