Literature DB >> 18676888

Antagonistic effect of rifampin on the efficacy of high-dose levofloxacin in staphylococcal experimental foreign-body infection.

O Murillo1, M E Pachón, G Euba, R Verdaguer, F Tubau, C Cabellos, J Cabo, F Gudiol, J Ariza.   

Abstract

Since levofloxacin at high doses was more active than levofloxacin at conventional doses and was the best therapy alone in a rat model of staphylococcal foreign-body infection, in this study we tested how these differences affect the activities of their respective combinations with rifampin in vitro and in vivo. In vitro studies were performed in the log and stationary phases. By using this model, rifampin at 25 mg/kg of body weight/12 h, levofloxacin at 100 mg/kg/day, levofloxacin at 100 mg/kg/day plus rifampin, levofloxacin at 50 mg/kg/day, levofloxacin at 50 mg/kg/day plus rifampin, or a control treatment was administered for 7 days; and therapy with for levofloxacin at 100 mg/kg/day alone and rifampin alone was prolonged to 14 days. We screened for the appearance of resistant strains. Killing curves in the log phase showed a clear antagonism with levofloxacin at concentrations >or=2x MIC and rifampin and tended to occur in the stationary phase. At the end of 7 days of therapy, levofloxacin at 100 mg/kg/day was the best treatment and decreased the bacterial counts from tissue cage fluid (P < 0.05 compared with the results for groups except those receiving rifampin alone). At the end of 14 days of therapy with levofloxacin at 100 mg/kg/day, levofloxacin at 100 mg/kg/day plus rifampin, and the control treatment, the bacterial counts on the coverslips were 2.24 (P < 0.05 compared with the results with the combined therapy), 3.36, and 5.4 log CFU/ml, respectively. No rifampin or levofloxacin resistance was detected in any group except that receiving rifampin alone. In conclusion, high-dose levofloxacin was the best treatment and no resistant strains appeared; the addition of rifampin showed an antagonistic effect. The efficacy of the rifampin-levofloxacin combination is not significantly improved by the dosage of levofloxacin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18676888      PMCID: PMC2565888          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00458-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  45 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  In vitro activities of ciprofloxacin and rifampin alone and in combination against growing and nongrowing strains of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D Bahl; D A Miller; I Leviton; P Gialanella; M J Wolin; W Liu; R Perkins; M H Miller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Role of rifampin for treatment of orthopedic implant-related staphylococcal infections: a randomized controlled trial. Foreign-Body Infection (FBI) Study Group.

Authors:  W Zimmerli; A F Widmer; M Blatter; R Frei; P E Ochsner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Treatment of acute post-surgical infection of joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Soriano; S García; G Bori; M Almela; X Gallart; F Macule; J Sierra; J A Martínez; S Suso; J Mensa
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Oral treatment of Staphylococcus spp. infected orthopaedic implants with fusidic acid or ofloxacin in combination with rifampicin.

Authors:  M Drancourt; A Stein; J N Argenson; R Roiron; P Groulier; D Raoult
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  Interaction between ciprofloxacin and rifampin.

Authors:  M E Temple; M C Nahata
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Antistaphylococcal effect related to the area under the curve/MIC ratio in an in vitro dynamic model: predicted breakpoints versus clinically achievable values for seven fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  Alexander A Firsov; Irene Y Lubenko; Sergey N Vostrov; Yury A Portnoy; Stephen H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Bactericidal activity of orally available agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Anjum S Kaka; Adriana M Rueda; Samuel A Shelburne; Kristina Hulten; Richard J Hamill; Daniel M Musher
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Conservative treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections in elderly patients.

Authors:  José Barberán; Lorenzo Aguilar; Guillermo Carroquino; María-José Giménez; Beatriz Sánchez; David Martínez; José Prieto
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  8 in total

1.  Efficacy of usual and high doses of daptomycin in combination with rifampin versus alternative therapies in experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Garrigós; O Murillo; G Euba; R Verdaguer; F Tubau; C Cabellos; J Cabo; J Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Activities of daptomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin and gentamicin against biofilm-forming methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an experimental model of endocarditis.

Authors:  Kerry L LaPlante; Suzanne Woodmansee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Activity of daptomycin or linezolid in combination with rifampin or gentamicin against biofilm-forming Enterococcus faecalis or E. faecium in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model using simulated endocardial vegetations and an in vivo survival assay using Galleria mellonella larvae.

Authors:  Megan K Luther; Marios Arvanitis; Eleftherios Mylonakis; Kerry L LaPlante
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin monotherapy for treatment of orthopedic implant-related staphylococcal infections.

Authors:  Rafael San Juan; Ana Garcia-Reyne; Pedro Caba; Fernando Chaves; Carlos Resines; Fernando Llanos; Francisco López-Medrano; Manuel Lizasoain; Jose Maria Aguado
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Unpredictable effects of rifampin as an adjunctive agent in elimination of rifampin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains grown in biofilms.

Authors:  Sander Croes; Patrick S Beisser; Cees Neef; Cathrien A Bruggeman; Ellen E Stobberingh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Influence of daily dosage and frequency of administration of rifampicin-levofloxacin therapy on tolerance and effectiveness in 154 patients treated for prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  S Nguyen; O Robineau; M Titecat; N Blondiaux; M Valette; C Loiez; E Beltrand; H Migaud; E Senneville
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Efficacy of high doses of daptomycin versus alternative therapies against experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  O Murillo; C Garrigós; M E Pachón; G Euba; R Verdaguer; C Cabellos; J Cabo; F Gudiol; J Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Efficacy of daptomycin-cloxacillin combination in experimental foreign-body infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Garrigós; O Murillo; J Lora-Tamayo; R Verdaguer; F Tubau; C Cabellos; J Cabo; J Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.