Literature DB >> 17008986

Diagnostic value of 64-slice multi-detector row cardiac CTA in symptomatic patients.

Georg Mühlenbruch1, Tobias Seyfarth, Chee Siong Soo, Namasivayam Pregalathan, Andreas Horst Mahnken.   

Abstract

Cardiac multi-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) angiography has shown high levels of sensitivity and especially negative predictive value regarding the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study was designed to determine the value of a 64-slice-MDCT scanner in comparison to invasive coronary angiography for the detection of CAD in a population of symptomatic patients. Fifty-one patients with suspected CAD underwent conventional coronary angiography and ECG-gated cardiac 64-slice-MDCT angiography with a rotation time of 330 ms, a collimation of 64x0.6 mm and a slice thickness of 0.75 mm. Blinded patient- and segment-based analysis was performed for the detection of stenoses >or=70% of the vessel lumen. 95% of all coronary segments were assessable by MDCT angiography. Patient-based (segment-based) analysis revealed a sensitivity of 97.8% (86.7%), specificity of 50% (95.2%), positive predictive value of 93.6% (75.2%) and negative predictive value of 75% (97.7%). Inter-rater agreement revealed a kappa-value of 0.558 (0.722). In this symptomatic patient group a 64-slice-MDCT scanner shows good agreement on a segment-based analysis but only moderate agreement on a patient-based analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice-MDCT coronary angiography is negatively influenced by the high pre-test probability of this symptomatic patient collective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17008986     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0429-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  28 in total

1.  Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT.

Authors:  S Achenbach; S Ulzheimer; U Baum; M Kachelriess; D Ropers; T Giesler; W Bautz; W G Daniel; W A Kalender; W Moshage
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  K Nieman; M Oudkerk; B J Rensing; P van Ooijen; A Munne; R J van Geuns; P J de Feyter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-02-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot.

Authors:  T Flohr; K Stierstorfer; R Raupach; S Ulzheimer; H Bruder
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-12

5.  Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Alexander W Leber; Franz von Ziegler; Carsten Rist; Sonja Buhmann; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Francesca Pugliese; Nico R A Mollet; Giuseppe Runza; Carlos van Mieghem; Willem B Meijboom; Patrizia Malagutti; Timo Baks; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J deFeyter; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution.

Authors:  A Kuettner; T Beck; T Drosch; K Kettering; M Heuschmid; C Burgstahler; C D Claussen; A F Kopp; S Schroeder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Koen Nieman; Filippo Cademartiri; Pedro A Lemos; Rolf Raaijmakers; Peter M T Pattynama; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction.

Authors:  Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Axel Kuettner; Tobias Trabold; Stephen Schroeder; Anja Feyer; Torsten Beck; Ariane Brueckner; Martin Heuschmid; Christof Burgstahler; Andreas F Kopp; Claus D Claussen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  22 in total

1.  Influence of intra-coronary enhancement on diagnostic accuracy with 64-slice CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Erica Maffei; Anselmo Alessandro Palumbo; Roberto Malagò; Ludovico La Grutta; W Bob Meiijboom; Annachiara Aldrovandi; Michele Fusaro; Luigi Vignali; Alberto Menozzi; Valerio Brambilla; Paolo Coruzzi; Massimo Midiri; Miles A Kirchin; Nico R A Mollet; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Defining myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  James Stirrup; Edward Nicol; S Richard Underwood
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Transitioning from 16-slice to 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: are we really making progress?

Authors:  Razi Khan; Sapna Rawal; Mark J Eisenberg
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Evaluation with 64-slice CT of the prevalence of coronary artery variants and congenital anomalies: a retrospective study of 3,236 patients.

Authors:  G Bazzocchi; A Romagnoli; M Sperandio; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Secondary prevention at 360°: the important role of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Anna Micaela Ciarrapico; Guglielmo Manenti; Chiara Pistolese; Sebastiano Fabiano; Roberto Fiori; Andrea Romagnoli; Gianluigi Sergiacomi; Matteo Stefanini; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Comparison of 128-Slice Dual Source CT Coronary Angiography with Invasive Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Rajneesh Madhok; Abhinav Aggarwal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

7.  The culprit lesion and its consequences: combined visualization of the coronary arteries and delayed myocardial enhancement in dual-source CT: a pilot study.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Philipp Bruners; Ola Friman; Anja Hennemuth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Contrast media volume optimization in high-pitch dual-source CT coronary angiography: feasibility study.

Authors:  Wen Jie Yang; Ke Min Chen; Bo Liu; Li Fang Pang; Huan Zhang; Zi Lai Pan; Fu Hua Yan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  64-Slice CT coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography: activity-based cost analysis.

Authors:  F Stacul; D Sironi; G Grisi; M Belgrano; A Salvi; M Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Measurement of coronary calcium scores by electron beam computed tomography or exercise testing as initial diagnostic tool in low-risk patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Christiane A Geluk; Riksta Dikkers; Patrick J Perik; René A Tio; Marco J W Götte; Hans L Hillege; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Janneke B Houwers; Tineke P Willems; Matthijs Oudkerk; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.