Literature DB >> 25572539

Secondary prevention at 360°: the important role of diagnostic imaging.

Anna Micaela Ciarrapico1, Guglielmo Manenti, Chiara Pistolese, Sebastiano Fabiano, Roberto Fiori, Andrea Romagnoli, Gianluigi Sergiacomi, Matteo Stefanini, Giovanni Simonetti.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to underline the importance of the role of general practitioners (GPs) in distributing vital information about prevention to citizens, to highlight the importance of the so-called voluntary prevention programmes, both for conditions for which no organised screening programmes exist and for those for which they do exist but may well be obsolete or inefficient. Nowadays, voluntary prevention is made more effective thanks to the new sophisticated diagnostic technologies applied worldwide by diagnostic imaging. Epidemiological data about the incidence and causes of death among the Italian population have shown that screening programmes should be aimed first at fighting the following diseases: prostatic carcinoma, lung cancer, colorectal carcinoma, breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, aortic and peripheral vascular disease. GPs do not generally give good or adequate instructions concerning voluntary prevention programmes; GPs may not even be aware of this type of prevention which could represent a valuable option together with the existing mass screening programmes. Therefore, in the following analysis, we aim to outline the correct diagnostic pathway for the prevention of diseases having the highest incidence in our country and which represent the most frequent causes of death. If used correctly, these screening programmes may contribute to the success of secondary prevention, limiting the use of tertiary prevention and thus producing savings for the Italian National Health System.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25572539     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-014-0484-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  81 in total

1.  Inappropriateness of breast imaging: cost analysis.

Authors:  Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Anna Micaela Ciarrapico; Francesca della Gatta; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Pamela M McMahon; Chung Y Kong; Daniel B Kopans; Paula D Ryan; Elissa M Ozanne; Elkan F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Steve Halligan; Riccardo Marmo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Multislice computed tomography in an asymptomatic high-risk population.

Authors:  Francesco Romeo; Roberto Leo; Fabrizio Clementi; Cinzia Razzini; Mauro Borzi; Eugenio Martuscelli; Francesco Pizzuto; Gaetano Chiricolo; Jawahar L Mehta
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics.

Authors:  James E Allison; Lori C Sakoda; Theodore R Levin; Jo P Tucker; Irene S Tekawa; Thomas Cuff; Mary Pat Pauly; Lyle Shlager; Albert M Palitz; Wei K Zhao; J Sanford Schwartz; David F Ransohoff; Joseph V Selby
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  [Recommendations of a national Italian consensus conference on the opportunity of extending screening service by mammography to 40-49 and 70-74 years of age women].

Authors:  Vito Distante; Stefano Ciatto; Alfonso Frigerio; Carlo Naldoni; Eugenio Paci; Antonio Ponti; Marco Rosselli del Turco; Marcello Vettorazzi; Marco Zappa
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.901

7.  Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Kenneth Song; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Sonographic detection of multifocality in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeong Mi Park; Ghil-Suk Yoon; Sun Mi Kim; Sei-Hyun Ahn
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.910

9.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  The cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: preliminary results of baseline screening.

Authors:  Juan P Wisnivesky; Alvin I Mushlin; Nachum Sicherman; Claudia Henschke
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.