Literature DB >> 20574631

The culprit lesion and its consequences: combined visualization of the coronary arteries and delayed myocardial enhancement in dual-source CT: a pilot study.

Andreas H Mahnken1, Philipp Bruners, Ola Friman, Anja Hennemuth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess combined analysis of coronary arteries and delayed myocardial contrast enhancement based on co-registration of coronary CT angiography and late-phase CT and automatic segmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Co-registration and late enhancement segmentation were applied to coronary CT angiography and late-phase CT images from six pigs with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and six patients with chronic MI. MI size was quantified by manual delineation, the established 3SD method, and a new mixture model approach. Correspondence between coronary artery lesions and MI was assessed visually from fused segmentation results.
RESULTS: Co-registration was successful in all cases. There was substantial agreement in the number of segments diagnosed with MI, comparing manual delineation and the mixture model for animal (κ = 0.839) and patient studies (κ = 0.770). There were no significant differences between the two methods (P > 0.05). In patients there was a discrepancy between the segmental distribution of MI and empirical coronary artery perfusion in 10/96 segments when compared with the true coronary branching pattern.
CONCLUSION: The mixture model approach is well suited for automated assessment of MI size from late-phase cardiac CT. Fusion imaging eliminates the need for empirical knowledge of the anatomical relationship between the coronary artery lesion and the area of myocardial ischaemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20574631     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1864-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Ralf Koos; Marcus Katoh; Joachim E Wildberger; Elmar Spuentrup; Arno Buecker; Rolf W Günther; Harald P Kühl
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar.

Authors:  Albert C Lardo; Marco A S Cordeiro; Caterina Silva; Luciano C Amado; Richard T George; Anastasios P Saliaris; Karl H Schuleri; Veronica R Fernandes; Menekhem Zviman; Saman Nazarian; Henry R Halperin; Katherine C Wu; Joshua M Hare; Joao A C Lima
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Timo Baks; Filippo Cademartiri; Amber D Moelker; Annick C Weustink; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Nico R Mollet; Gabriel P Krestin; Dirk J Duncker; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Diagnostic value of 64-slice multi-detector row cardiac CTA in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Georg Mühlenbruch; Tobias Seyfarth; Chee Siong Soo; Namasivayam Pregalathan; Andreas Horst Mahnken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Myocardial late enhancement in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI: distinction between infarction scar and non-infarction-related disease.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Thomas Schlosser; Florian M Vogt; Holger Eggebrecht; Axel Schmermund; Oliver Bruder; Walter O Schüler; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  A feasibility study of contrast enhancement of acute myocardial infarction in multislice computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and gross morphology in pigs.

Authors:  Arno Buecker; Marcus Katoh; Gabriele A Krombach; Elmar Spuentrup; Philipp Bruners; Rolf W Günther; Thoralf Niendorf; Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  A comprehensive approach to the analysis of contrast enhanced cardiac MR images.

Authors:  Anja Hennemuth; Achim Seeger; Ola Friman; Stephan Miller; Bernhard Klumpp; Steffen Oeltze; Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging.

Authors:  Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Maros Ferencik; Cesar H Nomura; Suhny Abbara; Udo Hoffmann; Herman K Gold; Ik-Kyung Jang; Thomas J Brady; Ricardo C Cury
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose.

Authors:  Stephan Baumüller; Sebastian Leschka; Lotus Desbiolles; Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Burkhardt Seifert; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Commentary on: delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial viability: low-dose high-pitch CT versus MRI.

Authors:  Florian Wolf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Myocardial delayed-enhancement CT: initial experience in children and young adults.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23

3.  Delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial viability: low-dose high-pitch CT versus MRI.

Authors:  Robert Goetti; Gudrun Feuchtner; Paul Stolzmann; Olivio F Donati; Monika Wieser; André Plass; Thomas Frauenfelder; Sebastian Leschka; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.