Literature DB >> 11718792

Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect.

F Vitu1, G W McConkie, P Kerr, J K O'Regan.   

Abstract

Previous research has found that words are identified most quickly when the eyes are near their center (the Optimal Viewing Position effect). A study was conducted to determine whether this same phenomenon is observed during reading, as revealed by a relationship between fixation position in a word and the duration of the fixation. An analysis of three large existing corpora of eye movement data, two from adults and one from children, showed a surprising inverted Optimal Viewing Position curve: mean fixation duration is greatest, rather than lowest, when the eyes were at the centers of words. From this phenomenon, we suggest an alternative explanation to the fixation duration trade-off effect in word refixations [O'Regan & Lévy-Schoen, Attention and performance XII: the psychology of reading (1987)]; the phenomenon also contradicts expectations of both oculomotor and cognitive theories of eye movement control. Attempts to test alternative explanations led to the discovery of another phenomenon, the Saccade Distance effect: mean fixation durations vary with the distance of the prior fixation from the currently-fixated word, being longer with greater distances. The durations of fixations in reading are complexly determined, with influences both from language and perceptual/oculomotor levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11718792     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00166-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  34 in total

1.  Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 0.957

2.  Fixation durations before word skipping in reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

3.  LATER predicts saccade latency distributions in reading.

Authors:  R H S Carpenter; Scott A McDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Simon P Liversedge; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Explorations in the language of perception and the perception of language.

Authors:  Ralph Radach; Arthur M Jacobs; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11

6.  An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

7.  The "risky" reading strategy revisited: New simulations using E-Z Reader.

Authors:  Victoria A McGowan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.