Literature DB >> 20144329

Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Susanne B Haga1.   

Abstract

With the rising number of individuals affected with diabetes and the significant health care costs of treatment, the emphasis on prevention is key to controlling the health burden of this disease. Several genetic and genomic studies have identified genetic variants associated with increased risk to diabetes. As a result, commercial testing is available to predict an individual's genetic risk. Although the clinical benefits of testing have not yet been demonstrated, it is worth considering some of the ethical implications of testing for this common chronic disease. In this article, I discuss several issues that should be considered during the translation of predictive testing for diabetes, including familial implications, improvement of risk communication, implications for behavioral change and health outcomes, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, direct-to-consumer testing, and appropriate age of testing. Copyright 2009 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20144329      PMCID: PMC2769962          DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  85 in total

1.  Reading between the lines: direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic testing.

Authors:  S C Hull; K Prasad
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Communicating genetic test results to the family: a six-step, skills-building strategy.

Authors:  M B Daly; A Barsevick; S M Miller; R Buckman; J Costalas; S Montgomery; R Bingler
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2001-10

Review 3.  Family-centered approaches to understanding and preventing coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Sharon L R Kardia; Stephen M Modell; Patricia A Peyser
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  The association between knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for cancer risk in the United States.

Authors:  Abigail Rose; Nikki Peters; Judy A Shea; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005-06

Review 5.  The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.

Authors:  Stuart Hogarth; Gail Javitt; David Melzer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.929

6.  The genetic testing of children. Working Party of the Clinical Genetics Society (UK)

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  The HeartSmart Family Fun Pack: an evaluation of family-based intervention for cardiovascular risk reduction in children.

Authors:  S Cookson; A Heath; L Bertrand
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

8.  BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families II: impact on relationships.

Authors:  Aideen McInerney-Leo; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Donald W Hadley; Ronald G Kase; Therese R Giambarresi; Elizabeth Johnson; Caryn Lerman; Jeffery P Struewing
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Should individuals be informed about their salt sensitivity status? First indications of the value of testing for genetic predisposition to low-risk conditions.

Authors:  Chris M R Smerecnik; Ilse Mesters; Hilde van Keulen; Ingrid Scheffers; Esther Beeks; Peter W De Leeuw; Nanne K de Vries; Hein de Vries
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2007

10.  Patients' understanding of genetic susceptibility testing in mainstream medicine: qualitative study on thrombophilia.

Authors:  Paula M Saukko; Sian Ellard; Suzanne H Richards; Maggie H Shepherd; John L Campbell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genomic counseling: next generation counseling.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The personalized medicine for diabetes meeting summary report.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

3.  Motivations of Patients with Diabetes to Participate in Research.

Authors:  Cynthia Geppert; Philip Candilis; Stephen Baker; Charles Lidz; Paul Appelbaum; Kenneth Fletcher
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2014

4.  Preferences regarding genetic research results: comparing veterans and nonveterans responses.

Authors:  N Arar; J Seo; S Lee; H E Abboud; L A Copeland; P Noel; M Parchman
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Nuclear receptor variants in liver disease.

Authors:  Roman Müllenbach; Susanne N Weber; Frank Lammert
Journal:  J Lipids       Date:  2011-12-21

6.  Lay perceptions of predictive testing for diabetes based on DNA test results versus family history assessment: a focus group study.

Authors:  Miranda Wijdenes-Pijl; Wybo J Dondorp; Danielle Rm Timmermans; Martina C Cornel; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Impact of genetic notification on smoking cessation: systematic review and pooled-analysis.

Authors:  Sylviane de Viron; Johan Van der Heyden; Elena Ambrosino; Marc Arbyn; Angela Brand; Herman Van Oyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.