Literature DB >> 16970936

Linguistic complexity and information structure in Korean: evidence from eye-tracking during reading.

Yoonhyoung Lee1, Hanjung Lee, Peter C Gordon.   

Abstract

The nature of the memory processes that support language comprehension and the manner in which information packaging influences online sentence processing were investigated in three experiments that used eye-tracking during reading to measure the ease of understanding complex sentences in Korean. All three experiments examined reading of embedded complement sentences; the third experiment additionally examined reading of sentences with object-modifying, object-extracted relative clauses. In Korean, both of these structures place two NPs with nominative case marking early in the sentence, with the embedded and matrix verbs following later. The type (pronoun, name or description) of these two critical NPs was varied in the experiments. When the initial NPs were of the same type, comprehension was slowed after participants had read the sentence-final verbs, a finding that supports the view that working memory in language comprehension is constrained by similarity-based interference during the retrieval of information necessary to determine the syntactic or semantic relations between noun phrases and verb phrases. Ease of comprehension was also influenced by the association between type of NP and syntactic position, with the best performance being observed when more definite NPs (pronouns and names) were in a prominent syntactic position (e.g., matrix subject) and less definite NPs (descriptions) were in a non-prominent syntactic position (embedded subject). This pattern provides evidence that the interpretation of sentences is facilitated by consistent packaging of information in different linguistic elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16970936      PMCID: PMC2084389          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  24 in total

1.  The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; G Kambe; S A Duffy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-11

Review 2.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity.

Authors:  Tessa Warren; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-08

4.  Memory-load interference in syntactic processing.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Randall Hendrick; William H Levine
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

Review 5.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Tessa Warren; Barbara J Juhasz; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Randall Hendrick; Marcus Johnson; Yoonhyoung Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.

Authors:  J W King; M Kutas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

10.  A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference.

Authors:  C Juliano; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1994-11
View more
  7 in total

1.  Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Michael Walsh Dickey; Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Effects of animacy and noun-phrase relatedness on the processing of complex sentences.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07

3.  Thematic roles, markedness alignment and processing complexity.

Authors:  Yoonhyoung Lee; Youan Kwon; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-06

4.  Disambiguation and Integration in Korean Relative Clause Processing.

Authors:  Michael Mansbridge; Sunju Park; Katsuo Tamaoka
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-08

5.  It's hard to offend the college: effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Filling Predictable and Unpredictable Gaps, with and without Similarity-Based Interference: Evidence for LIFG Effects of Dependency Processing.

Authors:  Kimberly Leiken; Brian McElree; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.