Literature DB >> 27943081

Disambiguation and Integration in Korean Relative Clause Processing.

Michael Mansbridge1, Sunju Park1, Katsuo Tamaoka2,3.   

Abstract

Previous studies on Korean relative clauses (RC) show that, with respect to processing, object-extracted relative clauses (ORC) are more difficult to process at the head noun than subject-extracted relative clauses within temporarily ambiguous contexts. ORCs, however, are predicted by experience-based processing models to incur a greater processing cost during early processing stages at the RC verb, since it is a likely locus of disambiguation for RCs in Korean, and because ORCs are a less frequent structure. Consequently, the current study investigates whether processing difficulty for ORCs manifests itself at the RC verb using eye-tracking methods, a simple sentence structure and a sentential-decision task. The results revealed significantly increased go-past reading times for ORCs at the RC verb. We believe this is a result of a less frequent structure being more difficult to parse during disambiguation. Accordingly, experience-based models of processing can accurately predict difficulty for ORCs in Korean.

Keywords:  Ambiguity; Experience; Eye-tracking; Korean; Relative clauses

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27943081     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-016-9461-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  19 in total

1.  Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996).

Authors:  Maryellen C MacDonald; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Processing relative clauses in Chinese.

Authors:  Franny Hsiao; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-11

3.  Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-04-27

4.  Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Randall Hendrick; Marcus Johnson; Yoonhyoung Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

6.  Task-dependent and task-independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing.

Authors:  David Caplan; Evan Chen; Gloria Waters
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

8.  Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence.

Authors:  John Hale
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-08

9.  Subject/object processing asymmetries in Korean relative clauses: Evidence from ERP data.

Authors:  Nayoung Kwon; Robert Kluender; Marta Kutas; Maria Polinsky
Journal:  Language (Baltim)       Date:  2013-09

10.  Strong expectations cancel locality effects: evidence from Hindi.

Authors:  Samar Husain; Shravan Vasishth; Narayanan Srinivasan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.