Literature DB >> 23961867

Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.

J W King1, M Kutas.   

Abstract

ERPs were recorded from 24 undergraduates as they read sentences known to differ in syntactic complexity and working memory requirements, namely Object and Subject Relative sentences. Both the single-word and multiword analyses revealed significant differences due to sentence type, while multiword ERPs also showed that sentence type effects differed for Good and Poor comprehenders. At the single-word level, ERPs to both verbs in Object Relative sentences showed a left anterior negativity between 300 and 500 msec postword-onset relative to those to Subject Relative verbs. At the multiword level, a slow frontal positivity characterized Subject Relative sentences, but was absent for Object Relatives. This slow positivity appears to index ease of processing or integration. and was more robust in Good than in Poor comprehenders.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 23961867     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  104 in total

1.  Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: insights from ERPs and fMRI.

Authors:  C J Fiebach; M Schlesewsky; A D Friederici
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

2.  Effects of age and speed of processing on rCBF correlates of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  David Caplan; Gloria Waters; Nathaniel Alpert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Expecting gender: an event related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish.

Authors:  Nicole Y Y Wicha; Eva M Moreno; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory.

Authors:  C J Fiebach; M Schlesewsky; G Lohmann; D Y von Cramon; A D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Effects of verbal event structure on online thematic role assignment.

Authors:  Evie Malaia; Ronnie B Wilbur; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-10

6.  The neural basis of breaking mental set: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Yufang Zhao; Shen Tu; Ming Lei; Jiang Qiu; Oscar Ybarra; Qinglin Zhang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Disambiguating information and memory resources in children's processing of Italian relative clauses.

Authors:  Fabrizio Arosio; Maria Teresa Guasti; Natale Stucchi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-04

8.  How the speed of working memory updating influences the on-line thematic processing of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Li; Yuan-Yuan Zheng; Hai-Yan Zhao; Jin-Yan Xia
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Expectation and Locality Effects in German Verb-final Structures.

Authors:  Roger P Levy; Frank Keller
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Reversing expectations during discourse comprehension.

Authors:  Ming Xiang; Gina Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.